Accessibility Skip to Top Navigation Skip to Main Content Home  |  Change Text Size  |  Contact IRS  |  About IRS  |  Site Map  |  Español  |  Help  

5.9.8  Processing Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases

5.9.8.1  (05-13-2008)
Introduction

  1. Reorganization. Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a rehabilitative proceeding that gives the debtor a "breathing period" from the petition filing to plan confirmation, during which time business affairs can be reorganized and a plan devised for the orderly payment of creditors. Chapter 11 is frequently referred to as the reorganization bankruptcy.

    • A Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition may be filed voluntarily by the debtor or involuntarily by creditors

    • An involuntary case may not be filed against a farmer or a noncommercial corporation

  2. Debtor-in-Possession/Trustee. In a Chapter 11 proceeding, the debtor usually operates as a debtor-in-possession (DIP). However, a trustee or an examiner may be appointed for cause, including fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, or gross mismanagement of the affairs of the debtor by current management, either before or after the commencement of the case (11 USC § 1104). For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, the bankruptcy court may appoint a trustee if grounds exist to convert or dismiss a case under 11 USC § 1112, but the court determines appointment of a trustee is in the best interests of creditors and the estate. The duties of the trustee or DIP include administering the estate and operating the debtor’s business (11 USC §§ 1106 and 1108). In a timely fashion, the DIP or trustee must either:

    1. file a plan or a report explaining why a plan will not be filed; or

    2. recommend the case be converted to another chapter or be dismissed.

  3. Complex/Long Duration. Chapter 11 cases are ordinarily more labor-intensive to monitor and evaluate than other bankruptcies because of complexities of the restructuring efforts in the process. After a plan is confirmed, the creditors must monitor their receipt of payments under the terms of the plan. A Chapter 11 bankruptcy case can last for several years.

  4. Centralized Insolvency Operation (CIO). Centralized Insolvency loads Chapter 11 cases onto AIS, runs IIP, and works the error, Potential Invalid TIN, and status reports (except for status 22) for those cases. If an MFT 31 split for a non-debtor spouse is required for an individual Chapter 11 case, the CIO technical units will perform all required mirroring actions. Chapter 11 mail received at the national mailing address in Philadelphia will be mailed, shipped overnight, or faxed to the Field group assigned the case depending on the urgency of the correspondence. (See IRM 5.9.11.3.2,Time Sensitive Mail. and IRM 5.9.11.3.3.1,Routine Notice Requiring Further Processing.)

  5. Field Insolvency Responsibility. With the exception of initial clerical processing and MFT 31 mirroring, Chapter 11 case work remains the responsibility of Field Insolvency groups. Chapter 11 caseworkers should ask trustees or DIPs to send plans, schedules, disclosure statements, and payments directly to the local Field office.

5.9.8.2  (03-01-2007)
The Chapter 11 Debtor

  1. Eligibility. Any entity eligible to file a Chapter 7 petition (individual, sole proprietor, partnership, or corporation) can file Chapter 11, except a stockbroker or a commodity broker. A railroad, which cannot file a Chapter 7 petition, may file a Chapter 11 petition.

  2. Main Chapter for Business Debtors. Chapter 11 is the primary reorganization chapter of the Bankruptcy Code for business debtors. Ideally, a reorganizing Chapter 11 plan is acceptable to most of the debtor's creditors because the plan is more likely (over time) to pay a greater amount of the debtor's pre-bankruptcy debts than if the business were liquidated. A Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows the debtor to continue business operations through a plan of reorganization which meets statutory criteria (11 USC §§ 1123, 1129). Cooperation among the various interests is crucial to a successful reorganization. Generally, reorganization, by preserving jobs and assets, is preferable to liquidation.

  3. Individuals and Chapter 11. An individual is eligible to file Chapter 11 even if the individual is not engaged in a business. However, when individuals file for bankruptcy, but want to retain the use of their non-exempt property, they may opt for a Chapter 13 proceeding if they are eligible.

    Note:

    While an individual Chapter 7 debtor filing on or after October 17, 2005, must wait at least eight years between Chapter 7 cases to obtain a second Chapter 7 discharge of debt pursuant to 11 USC § 727(a)(8), no similar limitation prevents a Chapter 11 debtor obtaining successive discharges. (See Exhibit 5.9.5-3.)

  4. Property of the Estate. Property of the estate in a Chapter 11 case includes the property listed in 11 USC § 541. When the Chapter 11 debtor is an individual in a bankruptcy case filed after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1115 provides that property of the estate also includes earnings from services performed by the debtor after the petition date until the case is dismissed, converted, or closed.

5.9.8.3  (05-13-2008)
Initial Processing

  1. Notice. The bankruptcy courts provide the IRS with notice of all Chapter 11 cases whether or not the IRS is listed as a creditor. This notice provides the date, time, and location of the first meeting of creditors, as required by 11 USC § 341. The court may also provide copies of the debtor’s schedules of assets and liabilities and the statement of financial affairs to the creditor.

  2. First Meeting of Creditors and Prepackaged Plans . The first meeting of creditors (also known as the 341 hearing) occurs generally 20-40 days after the filing of the petition. However, for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, under 11 USC § 341(e), upon request of a party in interest and after notice and hearing, the court can order the US trustee not to convene a meeting of creditors if the debtor files a prepackaged plan (a plan where the debtor solicits acceptance prior to the commencement of the case). Insolvency, with Counsel's concurrence, may consider opposing the 11 USC § 341(e) requests if the lack of a 341 hearing will compromise the Service's position.

  3. Preventing Violations of Automatic Stay. If Field Insolvency research reveals no liabilities or pending assessments on a case, a TC 520 control should remain on the account until the potential for a violation of the Bankruptcy Code expires. The freeze also allows for monitoring of postpetition tax compliance.

  4. Proof of Claim. If the Automated Proof of Claim (APOC) system is unavailable and the debtor owes taxes above the tolerance specified in LEM 5.9.13, a manual claim should be prepared and timely filed in accordance with IRM 5.9.13,Manual Proofs of Claim and Common Claim Issues. Motions and hearings involving the IRS can begin early in Chapter 11 cases, so the IRS claim should be on record as soon as possible. The bar date for filing proofs of claim in Chapter 11 cases is set by the court, but the Service has at least 180 days from the petition date pursuant to 11 USC § 502(b)(9).

    1. 11 USC § 1111(a) provides a claim is deemed to be filed for any debt listed on the debtor’s schedules, except a debt listed as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated.

    2. If all prepetition returns are not filed by the time the claim is filed, the liabilities for any unfiled returns should be shown as " unassessed" (formerly listed as estimated).

    3. APOC generates estimated claims systemically. When no basis is found for an estimated claim, APOC annotates the period as "Not Filed " and the dollar amount as "$100.00."

  5. LEM Criteria. The IRS should not rely on being listed in the schedules but should file a claim in every case meeting the Bankruptcy Code or LEM 5.9.13 requirements for filing a claim. However, the LEM tolerance criteria do not prohibit Insolvency from filing claims where liabilities fall below the stated dollar amounts. Local practice may specify filing claims on all balance due accounts.

    Note:

    APOC processing is not governed by LEM 5.9.13criteria.

5.9.8.4  (05-13-2008)
Initial Case Review for Chapter 11

  1. Initial Review. Insolvency caseworkers must conduct an initial case review and take primary case actions within 10 work days of a case's being assigned to a specialist or advisor. Elements of this review may be required sooner, for example, to resolve stay violations or to respond to pending motions or defensive litigation. All actions taken and findings in the review must be documented in the AIS history.

  2. IDRS. The caseworker must review IDRS to determine the debtor's:

    • filing requirements and return filing history

    • current balances due and delinquent returns

    • the latest quarter for which a Form 941 was filed if applicable

    • requirements for federal tax deposits (FTD) if applicable

    • currency with making FTDs since the latest Form 941 was filed if applicable

    • failure to make any FTDs if applicable

  3. Integrated Collection System (ICS). Caseworkers must review any ICS history for prior Field Collection involvement.

  4. TFRP Issues. For corporations caseworkers must conduct an Automated Trust Fund Recovery (AFTR) review to determine what periods, if any, are currently proposed to be assessed against which corporate officers. This information should be paired with the data on IDRS using command code UNLCER. The current RO assignment should be annotated in the AIS history.

  5. TFRP Actions for Corporate Debtors. If unpaid trust fund taxes are part of a corporation's balances due, a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) investigation must be considered. Based on local procedures the investigation may be conducted by Field Collection or by an Insolvency advisor. If local practice is to refer the investigation to Field Collection, the balances due meet the LEM 5.19.7 dollar criterion, and the case is not currently assigned to a revenue officer, an OI must be issued to Field Collection through ICS or Form 2209. Or the case may be assigned to an Insolvency advisor to conduct the required investigation. If the TFRP investigation is handled within Insolvency, the LEM dollar criterion need not be met. IRM 5.9.8.10, Trust Fund Considerations in Chapter 11;IRM 5.9.3.10, Trust Fund Recovery Penalty; and IRM 5.9.13.13, TFRP Assessments - Priority Status, provide additional TFRP investigation information.

    Note:

    TFRP investigation referrals need not necessarily be issued during the initial case review, but they must be issued in a timely manner to protect the ASED.

  6. Exam Issues. IRM 5.9.4.3,Examination and Insolvency, provides guidance for addressing examination issues including abusive tax avoidance transactions and employee plans.

  7. Refund Issues. The caseworker must ensure the correct bankruptcy freeze code has been placed on the account and check for the presence of a "quickie" refund request. IRM 5.9.8.8, Quickie Refunds, below provides direction in addressing these refund requests.

  8. Stay Violations. The caseworker must identify potential stay violations, be they liens recorded postpetition, levy proceeds received after the petition date, or notices sent in violation of the stay. IRM 5.9.8.6, Prepetition Levies, below provides guidance in addressing levies. Potential stay violations stemming from enforced collection must be resolved.

  9. Lien Refile and Adequate Protection. The caseworker must determine if any liens should be refiled and take necessary actions to request the lien refiling. (See IRM 5.9.5.9.2, Refiling of Liens.) The potential for adequate protection must be addressed upon the initial case review. (See IRM 5.9.8.5, Adequate Protection.)

  10. Employee Leasing. The caseworker must determine if employee leasing relationships exist. This is when the business purportedly transfers some or all of its employees to another entity that leases them back to the original employer. Coordination with Counsel is required if this situation is suspected.

  11. LLCs. The caseworker must identify the presence of LLCs. Consultation with Counsel is advised. IRM 5.9.13.14,Limited Liability Companies, provides more information about LLCs.

  12. Subsidiaries or Parent Company. The caseworker must determine if the entity is a subsidiary of a parent company or is a parent company with subsidiaries. Subsidiary refunds or liabilities must be noted in the AIS history. Difficult setoff issues arise when refunds are owed to members of consolidated group. If a refund is owed to a group or some of its members, and members of the group also owe liabilities, Insolvency should consult Counsel regarding the Service's setoff rights.

    Note:

    Members of a group can be severally liable for pension underfunding penalties under IRC § 4971 as well as income taxes.

  13. Prepackaged Chapter 11. The caseworker must determine if the case is a prepackaged bankruptcy which is a plan of reorganization in which the debtor solicits the creditors' approval prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. If the plan has been prepackaged and the Service was not part of the negotiations, the caseworker must secure a copy of the plan, review it expeditiously, and consult Counsel.

  14. Significant Cases and Referrals to Counsel. As directed in IRM 5.9.4.13.3,Referrals on Significant Bankruptcy Case Issues, cases meeting the Significant Bankruptcy Case Program criteria must be referred to Counsel within two business days of identification. Upon referral Counsel takes an active role in coordinating the Service’s efforts in these cases, which are usually Chapter 11 cases.

  15. Notice to TEGE. To protect the integrity of employee plans of businesses that have declared bankruptcy, Insolvency must notify the Employee Plan (EP) function of the Tax Exempt/Government Entity (TEGE) division when a Chapter 11 bankruptcy meeting " significant case" criteria is filed or a nationally known company has filed bankruptcy even though that company may not have a tax liability. Upon initial review of the Chapter 11 case, if the Field Insolvency caseworker identifies a "significant case" or nationally known debtor, the caseworker must take the following steps within two business days of the identification:

    1. Print a copy of the AIS entity screen showing the debtor's name, TIN, docket number, and petition date.

    2. Prepare Form 3210 with the annotation, "The attached prints represent Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings which may impact employee plans."

    3. Mail the F3210 and attached AIS screen prints to:
      EP Classification
      9350 Flair Drive, 2nd Floor
      El Monte, CA 91731

    4. Annotate the AIS history that an AIS print has been forwarded to EP for review.

  16. Prior Bankruptcies. The caseworker must check for evidence of prior bankruptcies and how they may affect tolling, bring into question the feasibility of the present plan of reorganization, and affect application of the automatic stay. In some cases where a debtor has previously filed bankruptcy, the automatic stay may not apply or may terminate early with respect to the debtor and the debtor's property that is not property of the estate. (11 USC § 362(c)(3) and (4); 362(n).) In some instances debtors may contend, inasmuch as prior plans were supposed to have addressed the tax liabilities, those liabilities are no longer considered to be a tax claim.

  17. Withholding Lock-in Letters. For cases where individuals are filing Chapter 11 bankruptcies, the determination on referring cases to the Withholding Compliance function for a lock-in letter must be made during initial case review. IRM 5.9.5.13 provides procedures for lock-in letter review and referral.

  18. Letter to Non-Debtor Spouse. Upon initial Chapter 11 case review for individuals, letters must be sent to non-debtor spouses where joint prepetition liabilities covered by the bankruptcy will not be fully abated for the non-debtor spouse. IRM 5.9.10.3(9) provides the requirements for the letters' contents. With local Counsel guidance and approval, Field Insolvency offices must develop letters to meet this requirement.

5.9.8.5  (05-13-2008)
Adequate Protection

  1. Protection for Secured Creditors. Adequate protection safeguards a secured creditor against a decrease in the value of a creditor’s collateral during the period prior to confirmation of the plan when a creditor is stayed from taking collection action and is not receiving plan payments. Adequate protection may be requested based on LEM 5.9.4 to protect the value of the creditor's interest in the property being used by the DIP and a valid Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) has been recorded (11 USC § 361).

  2. Initial Considerations for Adequate Protection. The caseworker must first determine if schedules of assets and liabilities have been filed. If so and the Service does not have copies, the caseworker must contact the debtor in possession or trustee for schedules along with a aged list of the business' accounts receivable. From this information the caseworker can establish a rationale for requesting adequate protection. The IRS may be entitled to adequate protection when a prepetition NFTL attaches to equity in assets which will depreciate during the bankruptcy proceeding or be consumed in the normal course of business, as is the case with cash collateral or inventory. If the debtor arranges for postpetition financing for property subject to the lien, the IRS may also be entitled to adequate protection of its interest.

    Note:

    If available, Accurint should be researched to identify related entities and to value assets.

  3. Turnover/Adequate Protection. A voluntary Chapter 11 filing is sometimes preceded by the IRS's levying upon or seizing assets of the debtor. After filing bankruptcy the debtor may immediately file a motion with the bankruptcy court requesting a "turnover " order for the IRS to surrender the property to the debtor or to release a levy (11 USC § 542). The Chapter 11 caseworker must ensure the debtor is providing adequate protection to the IRS for turnover of such property. Counsel guidance should be sought when holding levy funds in anticipation of an adequate protection order.

  4. Most Common Types. Adequate protection usually includes periodic cash payments (the most common form) on the secured claim and/or replacement liens on postpetition assets. SBSE Division Counsel has set minimum dollar criteria for pursuit of adequate protection with Area Counsel having leeway to adjust the dollar guidelines if appropriate. (See LEM 5.9.4.) Field Insolvency offices must coordinate all adequate protection agreements with their local Counsel.

  5. Sources of Adequate Protection. Adequate protection can take the form of:

    • retaining a portion of any funds received

    • receiving monthly payments (with postpetition interest) before a plan is confirmed

    • obtaining replacement liens on after-acquired assets (for example, accounts receivable and inventory)

    • providing for postpetition tax compliance

    • any other appropriate relief

  6. Adequate Protection Agreement. The Adequate Protection Agreement should provide for protection to replace the property being released. This can include:

    1. the IRS's receiving all, or a portion, of the cash (if cash is involved);

    2. periodic payments, including payment of postpetition interest;

    3. a replacement lien on after-acquired assets, such as inventory or accounts receivable;

    4. requiring the debtor to file all delinquent returns, timely file all postpetition returns, and pay all postpetition tax obligations (see 11 USC § 1112(b)(4)(I)); and

    5. default provisions. (See paragraph (7) below.)

  7. Default Provisions. Adequate protection agreements should include language outlining actions to be taken in the event of default. Those provisions can include:

    1. notice of default to the debtor and debtor's attorney with a short "cure" timeframe;

    2. a "drop dead" clause providing for unopposed conversion to Chapter 7 if the default is not cured;

    3. an automatic lifting of the stay against collection if the default is not cured; or

    4. any other appropriate remedy.

  8. Time Constraints. Creditors, including the IRS, are only entitled to adequate protection if it is requested. If adequate protection is applicable, it must be requested before the assets are dissipated.

    Note:

    The court can deny a request for adequate protection deeming the proposed arrangement to be unsatisfactory or inadequate. The proposal may be renegotiated with court approval.

5.9.8.6  (01-01-2006)
Prepetition Levies

  1. Intangible Property. Under 11 USC § 542, unless the automatic stay is lifted, the IRS must release prepetition levies on bank accounts and accounts receivable when the debtor retains an interest in the cash or cash equivalent on the date of the petition (i.e., the IRS has not actually received the cash and applied it to the taxpayer’s account). (See IRM 5.9.3.11.1, Third Party Contacts.)

  2. Avoidance. If the IRS receives payment before the petition as a result of a levy and applies the payment to the taxpayer’s account, the funds are no longer subject to turnover under 11 USC § 542, but they may be preferential transfers subject to avoidance under 11 USC § 547 if the requirements of 11 USC § 547 are met. (See IRM 5.9.4.6,Preferences.)

    Note:

    Voluntary payments of the trust fund portion of employment taxes, and other trust fund taxes made by persons other than the debtor, are not subject to avoidance. These payments are not transfers of property of the debtor.

  3. Tangible Property. Absent extenuating circumstances which allow the automatic stay to be lifted, the IRS is required to release prepetition levies on tangible property. If seized prepetition, the property generally must be turned over to the estate as long as the debtor retains an interest in the property on the date of the petition (e.g., the property has not yet been sold at a tax sale).

  4. Right to Adequate Protection. Although the property is generally required to be turned over, the IRS is entitled adequate protection of its secured interest in the property if a prepetition NFTL has been filed. (See IRM 5.9.8.7(2), Lien Rights.)

  5. Release versus Referral. Negotiations involving adequate protection are the responsibility of Insolvency employees, and they are generally conducted with the debtor's attorney. Counsel should be consulted for local procedures.

    1. Release. If the value of the property does not exceed the minimum dollar criteria for a referral for a motion for relief from the stay or adequate protection, the levy or seizure should be released immediately.

    2. Referral. If the value exceeds the minimum amount, Insolvency should refer the case expeditiously to Counsel to consider a motion for relief from the stay or adequate protection while the agreement is being negotiated with the debtor.

5.9.8.7  (01-01-2006)
Cash Collateral/Property Depreciation of the Estate

  1. " Ordinary Course of Business. " In a Chapter 11 case, the debtor-in-possession typically wants to continue running the business until it can be reorganized or sold. The debtor may automatically continue its routine (" ordinary course" ) use, sale, or lease of most of its prepetition property pursuant to 11 USC §§ 363(c)(1) and 1107(a).

  2. Lien Rights. If the IRS has a secured claim, the Service may be entitled to adequate protection when an NFTL, properly filed prepetition, is still valid and attaches to equity in property and/or cash collateral.

  3. Cash Collateral. The Bankruptcy Code can significantly limit a debtor's ability to use its cash collateral without the consent of creditors with secured interests in such property. Cash collateral includes cash and cash equivalents, such as negotiable instruments and funds in depository accounts. (See Exhibit 5.9.1-1, Glossary – Bankruptcy Terms.) For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, the unauthorized use of cash collateral that is substantially harmful to one or more creditors is an express basis for conversion or dismissal of the case per 11 USC § 1112(b)(4)(D).

    Note:

    The limitations in the Bankruptcy Code on the debtor's use of cash collateral and restrictions are significant in Chapter 11 cases. This is because operating businesses in bankruptcy are found most typically in Chapter 11 cases and have the greatest need for immediate cash to continue running.

  4. Superpriority Liens in a Chapter 11 Proceeding. 11 USC § 364 provides debtors may, with court approval, obtain postpetition financing. To induce lenders to grant this financing, superpriority liens can be offered. Such liens become senior to all other liens.

    Note:

    In accordance with 11 USC § 364(d), superpriority liens can be provided only if the holder of the previous lien, including the IRS, is adequately protected and agreements are negotiated.

  5. Real Property and Adequate Protection. Adequate protection is seldom sought by the IRS regarding real property due to its unlikely depreciation. However, unusual situations might arise making adequate protection necessary. At a minimum, the debtor should be required to maintain sufficient insurance on buildings and other improvements.

  6. Insolvency Actions. If the IRS is entitled to adequate protection based on lien equity, Insolvency should:

    1. send AIS Letter 2173, or an equivalent local letter, to the debtor with a copy to the debtor’s attorney, advising the IRS does not consent to the use of the cash collateral;

    2. based on response(s) received, attempt to reach an agreement; negotiations for adequate protection of the government's lien interests will follow guidelines similar to those used when the IRS negotiates a prepetition levy agreement; and

    3. make a prompt referral to Counsel, asking for a motion to provide adequate protection to the IRS if delay is experienced and/or nonproductive responses are received.

5.9.8.8  (03-01-2007)
Quickie Refunds

  1. Tentative Carryback Adjustments. Taxpayers who have net losses can sometimes carry back the losses to previous years where they paid taxes to reduce the liability in the prior year and generate a refund. Such taxpayers may also make a special request for such a refund, known as a tentative carryback adjustment also called a "quickie refund." To request a quickie refund, the taxpayer must file an application for the tentative carryback adjustment, and the Service must make a limited review of the application and issue the refund within 90 days.

  2. IRS Offsets. The Service has the right to offset the quickie refund against federal tax liabilities of the taxpayer. This right of offset becomes particularly important when the taxpayer is in bankruptcy, because dollar amounts of quickie refunds can be large, and offset may be the only assured way of collecting liabilities owing from the taxpayer. Difficult mutuality issues are raised, however, when losses from postpetition periods are carried back to prepetition years, or when a refund is owed to a consolidated group and the liabilities are owed by a single member of the group. Insolvency should consult Counsel in such cases.

  3. The Automatic Stay Against Setoffs. While the automatic stay prevents the Service from making the setoff by crediting the refund against the liability, the Service may freeze the refund until the stay is lifted. Insolvency specialists and advisors must consult Counsel if the debtor is owed a quickie refund and the Service has a claim.

  4. IRS Offsets under BAPCPA. USC § 362(b)(26) provides that for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, the IRS can setoff a prepetition income tax refund against a prepetition income tax liability without a lift of the automatic stay. Insolvency specialists and advisors should consult Counsel if the debtor is owed a quickie refund on a case filed on or after October 17, 2005, both the liability and the quickie refund are prepetition, and the Service has a claim. If the quickie refund comes from a postpetition period or the liability is not for income tax, a lift of stay or local rules/standing orders allowing the offset are required regardless of the petition date.

  5. Inappropriate Refunds. To prevent these special refunds from going out to taxpayers who are in bankruptcy and owe federal taxes, procedures have been set in place to review the quickie refund claims expeditiously so Counsel can file a motion for lift stay for offset if necessary.

  6. Interagency Offset Requests. The federal government is considered one creditor for purposes of offset. Upon becoming aware of a potential tax refund, a federal agency other than the IRS may seek to have the refund offset against its claim. However, the Service does not have the authority to disclose the refund to another federal agency. If Insolvency receives a request to freeze a refund on behalf of another federal agency, the caseworker assigned to the account must consult Counsel before taking any action.

  7. TCB Units. Tentative carrybacks for business returns originate from the filing of either a Form 1139 or Form 1120X. For individuals, the appropriate forms are Form 1045 or Form 1040X. Tentative Carryback (TCB) Units responsible for processing the carryback requests are located at the Ogden and Cincinnati campuses. Generally when the TCB Units determine a tentative carryback claim is processable, they research IDRS to see if the taxpayer owes federal taxes and if a bankruptcy freeze is on the account.

  8. Insolvency Contact. When a bankruptcy freeze is on an account, the TCB Unit must contact the Field Insolvency caseworker assigned the case. If the TCB Unit has difficulty in locating the Insolvency caseworker, it should call the Insolvency liaison at the Centralized Insolvency Operation for the name and phone number of the caseworker working the bankruptcy case. The TCB Unit caseworker will advise the Insolvency caseworker of the amount of the carryback credit and the processing time remaining.

  9. Counsel Contact. Following the LEM criteria for referrals to Counsel when appropriate, the Insolvency caseworker should advise Counsel of the tentative carryback through a referral asking for a motion to lift the stay to setoff the refund against the taxes owed. Also, as mentioned above, Counsel should be consulted before the setoff of a quickie refund arising from the carryback of losses from a postpetition year to a prepetition year, or when the refund is owed to a consolidated group and the liabilities are owed by a single member of the group.

  10. Interest Free Period. Decisions to offset the tentative carryback credit or refund it to the debtor are under strict time constraints. By statute, quickie refunds must be issued within 90-days unless the government has a right of setoff. But the statutory period during which the Service is exempt from paying interest to the taxpayer is only 45 days from the date the quickie refund request is received by the IRS to the date of refund issuance. Therefore, if setoff is not appropriate under 11 USC § 362(b)(26) because of the petition date or the period generating the refund, to minimize the amount of interest the Service may have to pay the debtor, both the TCB Units and Insolvency need to react quickly in determining if a lift of stay should be requested.

5.9.8.9  (03-01-2007)
Collection Statute of Limitations and Chapter 11 Plans

  1. Tax Collection Waivers. Pursuant to IRC § 6502(a), as amended by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98), the Service can no longer obtain waivers of the statute of limitations for collection (Form 900) except in conjunction with IRC § 6159 installment agreements or the release of a levy.

  2. Chapter 11 Plans Are Not Installment Agreements. Although Chapter 11 plans make a series of periodic (installment) payments to the Service, typically toward the taxpayer's priority and secured tax debts, with interest, the Chapter 11 plan differs in many respects from an installment agreement under IRC § 6159, and is, therefore, not considered as such.

  3. Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED) and Confirmed Plans. The limitation period for collecting a tax provided for by a confirmed Chapter 11 plan is generally suspended automatically via IRC § 6503(h)(2)while the taxpayer is current on Chapter 11 plan payments up to the time the taxpayer is in substantial default on the plan payments, plus six months.

  4. Waiver Expiration Date. Collection statute limitation waivers (Form 900) obtained from taxpayers before December 31, 1999, outside of the context of an installment agreement, expired automatically on or before December 31, 2002.

    Note:

    The automatic suspension of the collection limitation period pursuant to IRC § 6503(h)(2), while the automatic stay is in effect and while a confirmed Chapter 11 plan providing fully for the tax is in effect, is not shortened by a collection limitation waiver between the debtor and the Service that expires at an earlier date.

  5. CSED and Corporate Cases in Chapter 11. In corporate cases and other cases where the debtor is not an individual, the Service may generally rely on the suspension of the limitation period provided for in IRC § 6503(h)(2) to collect tax payments after confirmation of Chapter 11 plans. The Service should, nevertheless, insist Chapter 11 plans be paid in full within the timeframes required by the Bankruptcy Code.

  6. CSED and Individuals in Chapter 11. As stated in paragraph (3) above, when the debtor is an individual, and the plan provides for the full payment of a particular tax, the Service may also generally rely on IRC § 6503(h)(2) for the suspension of the collection period if the debtor is current on plan payments. However, the Service cannot rely on the IRC § 6503(h)(2) suspension in cases where the debtor is an individual with respect to taxes that are both (1) non-dischargeable, and (2) for which full payment is not provided in the plan.

  7. CSED and Non-dischargeable Taxes in Individual Chapter 11. In bankruptcy cases of individuals where a confirmed Chapter 11 plan does not provide for full payment of non-dischargeable tax liabilities such as priority tax claims, gap interest on those claims, penalties claimed as general unsecured for a return late filed within two years of the petition date, or others; or where surviving federal tax liens are not provided for fully by the confirmed plan, the Service must consider the following:

    1. CSED on Non-dischargeable Taxes in Plan. Collection, outside of the plan, of non-dischargeable liability not provided for in the plan, may be considered when the CSED will expire on the non-dischargeable period in question before the plan completion date.

    2. Adverse Plan Language. The plan should be reviewed for language restricting property of the estate from being revested in the debtor at confirmation, or providing the bankruptcy estate will retain control of the property to some future point after confirmation. Language restricting collection outside of the plan should be considered when contemplating collection of non-dischargeable, non-plan liability concurrently with plan payments. Where possible, prior to plan confirmation, the Service should request deficient plans be modified to provide for administrative remedies for collecting the debtor's unpaid taxes following a substantial default, for language which specifies the collection limitation period under the Internal Revenue Code will be suspended for particular tax debts for so long as the plan is in effect, not in substantial default and for six months thereafter, per IRC § 6503(h)(2), or that the collection period will not expire for a reasonable period of time (to be negotiated) after the plan payments are either completed, or the plan falls into substantial default. Consultation with Counsel may be necessary to determine local practice with respect to default language. (See IRM 5.9.8.14.2(3)(m).)

    3. Post-Confirmation Lien Filing on Non-plan Portion of Non-dischargeable Liability. 11 USC § 1141(a) states the provisions concerning non-dischargeability in 11 USC § 1141(d)(2) and (3) are exceptions to the general rule that a confirmed plan binds debtors. As non-dischargeable taxes are excepted from the binding effect of a plan, the argument can be made § 1141(a) does not bar the filing of an NFTL for non-dischargeable taxes. § 1141(c) provides that after confirmation, all the property dealt with by a plan is free and clear of the claims of prepetition creditors except as otherwise provided in the plan. Subsection (c) contains the same exception for subsections (d)(2) and (d)(3) as subsection (a). Therefore, it appears § 1141(c) does not apply to non-dischargeable taxes and that it typically does not bar the filing of NFTLs, post-confirmation, for non-dischargeable taxes. However, for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, property of the estate includes property acquired by the debtor postpetition (as it does in Chapter 13) if the debtor is an individual (11 USC § 1115).

      Caution:

      When filing any NFTL, Insolvency must ensure the debtor receives all rights required by law. (See IRM 5.12.2.3, Taxpayer Contact.)

    4. Plan Defaults. The Service should consider the impact collection of a non-dischargeable liability not provided for in the confirmed plan may have on the successful completion of the confirmed plan, but at the same time must take appropriate action when the CSED is no longer suspended after the automatic stay is lifted. Where the plan has already defaulted, this should not be a concern since the harm has already occurred.

    5. Setoff. The Service may use setoff opportunities to collect non-dischargeable, non-plan liability outside of the plan before the plan is in substantial default.

    6. Secured Claims and Exempt/Excluded/Abandoned Property. Where the confirmed plan does not provide for full payment of the secured tax liability, the Service takes the position its prepetition, perfected NFTLs remain enforceable against the debtor's exempted, excluded, or abandoned property outside of the plan.

    7. Excluded Property. The Service has taken a new position on the status of property excluded from the estate, specifically retirement plans. (Retirement plans with spendthrift provisions are excluded from the bankruptcy estate pursuant to 11 USC § 541.) Collection can be pursued from excluded property even if an NFTL is not on file to pay non-dischargeable periods that will not be fully paid where the CSED will expire by the plan completion date. Also, collection may be pursued against excluded property to enforce a prepetition lien for dischargeable periods.

    8. Revenue Officer Coordination. Where collection of any non-dischargeable, non-plan liability is being considered outside the plan, the caseworker may request the assistance of a Revenue Officer through an OI.

    9. Counsel Coordination. In any case where collection of non-dischargeable liability is proposed outside the plan for liabilities not provided for in the confirmed plan, the Insolvency caseworker should consult Counsel to determine an appropriate course of action.

    10. IDRS Status. Where the plan provides for partial payment of non-dischargeable liability, the account will be kept in IDRS status 72 until there is a substantial plan default or until the plan is completed.

  8. CSED - Individuals and Secured Claims. Similarly, in cases where the debtor is an individual, the Service cannot rely on the suspension of the collection statute regarding secured claims if the plan does not provide for full payment of the secured claim. The following situations apply these principles:

    1. The tax is non-dischargeable, and the Service did not file a proof of claim (for example, the Service was not aware of the liability before the bar date).

    2. The tax or tax penalty is non-dischargeable but is not entitled to priority claim treatment (for example, non-priority taxes and tax penalties described in 11 USC §§ 523(a)(1)(B), 523(a)(1)(C), or 523(a)(7)), and the Service filed a general unsecured claim for these taxes or penalties; the plan provided for less than full payment of these claims).

    3. The tax, though otherwise dischargeable, was secured by property that was excluded or exempted from, or abandoned by the bankruptcy estate.

5.9.8.10  (03-01-2007)
Trust Fund Considerations in Chapter 11

  1. Policy Statement P-5-60. Absent statute of limitations considerations, the general policy of the Service is to refrain from asserting the TFRP against non-debtor responsible persons in cases where the corporate debtor's Chapter 11 plan provides for full payment of trust fund taxes, as long as the plan is not in default(IRS Policy Statement P-5-60).

  2. RO Assigned Accounts. When the trust fund balance due accounts (e.g., corporate Forms 941) are assigned to field Collection at the time of the bankruptcy petition, the revenue officer (RO) manager is responsible for issuing an ICS Other Investigation to an RO to conduct the investigation as soon as possible. The RO should periodically update Insolvency on the progress of the investigation.

  3. Non-RO Assigned Balance Due Accounts. Insolvency is responsible for initiating the TFRP investigation in bankruptcies, not involving balance due accounts already assigned to field Collection as of the bankruptcy petition filing date. Insolvency may either issue an ICS Other Investigation or Form 2209 to the field or assign the TFRP investigation to an Insolvency advisor. Also, see IRM 5.9.3.10,Trust Fund Recovery Penalty.

  4. LEM-TFRP Criteria. Generally, Insolvency should initiate a TFRP investigation based on the TFRP criteria in LEM 5.19.7, considering tolerance and collectibility factors.

  5. Withholding of TFRP Investigation. If a TFRP investigation is withheld based on the LEM dollar criterion, expiration of the assessment statute may be allowed without Insolvency intervention. In that circumstance, established procedures must be followed and clearly documented on AIS explaining the reason the TFRP investigation was withheld.

    Caution:

    If less than six months remain before the ASED, the case should not be forwarded to Collection for a TFRP investigation.

  6. In Chapter 11 – Withholding Assessment Against Responsible Persons. If the debtor is a corporation responsible for unpaid trust fund taxes, assertion of the TFRP against responsible persons will normally be withheld while the proceeding is pending prior to confirmation of a plan of reorganization. However, note paragraph (7) below. If the corporate debtor has a confirmed reorganization plan providing for full payment of the trust fund taxes, assertion and collection of the TFRP is normally deferred as long as the corporate debtor is current with plan payments.

  7. Indicators to Consider – Doubtful Collection. For any case meeting the LEM dollar criterion, the trust fund investigation should be conducted as soon as possible to identify potential responsible officers and to secure waivers when possible. Forbearance from asserting and collecting the TFRP will remain, unless factors indicate ultimate collection is doubtful from the corporate debtor. Indicators of doubtful ultimate collection follow.

    1. Potentially responsible individuals will not sign Form 2750, Waiver Extending Statutory Period for Assessment of Trust Fund Recovery Penalty.

    2. Additional unpaid liabilities pyramid after the petition date.

    3. The corporation continues to operate at a loss.

    4. Assets are liquidated.

    5. Excessive compensation is paid to officers during the bankruptcy proceeding.

    6. Unreasonable delay occurs in proposing a plan.

    7. The debtor is unable to effectuate a plan.

    8. The debtor defaults on plan payments or is only paying on the plan sporadically.

    Note:

    The assigned Insolvency caseworker must be alert to efforts by responsible parties who might be assessed TFRPs to persuade the court to prevent assessment and collection of the TFRP by the IRS arguing they want to devote their time and attention to directing a successful Chapter 11 reorganization. The court cannot prevent collection from non-debtors.

  8. Designation of Payments in Chapter 11 Plans. In Chapter 11 cases, when a corporate debtor owes the IRS significant prepetition trust fund taxes, the debtor-in-possession may seek in its plan to designate IRS application of the earliest payments required under the plan to satisfy the corporation's outstanding trust fund taxes first.

    1. A corporate debtor's designation of plan payments first to trust fund taxes can be an attempt to shift the risk of a failed Chapter 11 plan from the corporation's "responsible parties" onto the IRS. The DIP may be seeking to shield its "responsible parties" from the assertion and collection of a TFRP should the plan not be completed.

    2. The Supreme Court has ruled bankruptcy courts can approve Chapter 11 plans which order the IRS to apply a Chapter 11 debtor's plan payments to trust fund taxes first if the court concludes the designation of payments in this manner is necessary for the success of the reorganization plan.

    3. However, the Service may challenge whether proposed designations of payments to trust fund taxes are necessary to the success of reorganizing Chapter 11 plans on the ground that the continued existence of personal liability for taxes of the debtor corporation provide an incentive for responsible officers to make the reorganization a success. Given the Service’s policy that, absent statute of limitations considerations, the Service will generally refrain from asserting the TFRP against non-debtor responsible officers where the plan provides for full payment as long as the plan is not in default (Policy Statement P-5-60), designations should rarely be necessary. Courts remain split on if a bankruptcy court may designate the application of payments made under a Chapter 11 plan to trust fund taxes when the plan provides for the debtor's liquidation, rather than the debtor's continuation as a reorganized business.

    4. Application of the bankruptcy plan payments will be made according to the Designated Payment Code (DPC) shown on the transaction as outlined in Document 6209. DPC 99 signifies the payment is " Miscellaneous." If a payment posts with DPC 03, the payment is "Bankruptcy, Non-Designated." DPC 11 identifies the payment as "Bankruptcy, Designated to Trust Fund."

      Reminder:

      A TFRP assessment is classified as priority (unless secured by a lien) on the Service's proof of claim. A TFRP is never to be paid as a general unsecured claim. Despite being called a penalty, the TFRP is treated as a tax.

5.9.8.11  (05-13-2008)
Postpetition/Preconfirmation BMF Monitoring

  1. After Initial Case Review. Once the initial case review has been completed, Insolvency caseworkers must monitor the debtor's compliance with filing, making FTDs, and adherence to adequate protection orders prior to plan confirmation. Compliance monitoring must be conducted for all in-business debtors, including those cases where no proof of claim will be filed or no money is owed.

  2. Deposit Requirements. Caseworkers should review preconfirmation compliance for making federal tax deposits based on the business' FTD requirements. A business required to make deposits monthly or more frequently should be reviewed on a monthly basis. Businesses required to make quarterly deposits should be reviewed quarterly. If the debtor has been non-compliant prepetition or becomes non-compliant postpetition/preconfirmation, it may be advisable to review the case after each required deposit.

    Note:

    Form 944 filers (annual filing) must make FTDs under the applicable deposit rules.

  3. Contact with Debtor. At any time the debtor is found to be delinquent in making FTDs, the caseworker must attempt to contact the debtor by phone. During the phone call the caseworker must advise the debtor the business has 10 calendar days to deposit all delinquent FTDs. The caseworker must enumerate the possible consequences of non-compliance which may include the Service's:

    • filing form 6338, Request for Payment of Internal Revenue Taxes, with the court (see paragraph (9) below)

    • requesting the appointment of a trustee

    • filing a motion to have the Chapter 11 proceeding converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy

    • filing a motion to have the case dismissed

    • filing a motion for relief from the automatic stay

    If the debtor cannot be reached by phone, the caseworker must send a letter to the debtor establishing the 10 day deadline to respond.

    Note:

    The caseworker should consider whether an existing adequate protection order requires timely deposits. If so, and the debtor is not making deposits, the case may be referred to Counsel if the tolerance criteria in LEM 5.9.4 are met.

  4. Contact Ineffective. If contact with the debtor by phone or letter does not bring the debtor into FTD compliance, the caseworker should file an administrative claim and send a copy to the US trustee. Further actions to be considered are:

    1. negotiating an agreed order for compliance with FTD requirements with a "conversion" or "drop dead" clause; or

    2. referring the case to Counsel to consider conversion or dismissal if the postpetition unpaid tax meets the tolerance criteria in LEM 5.9.4. (See paragraph (10) below.)

  5. LAMS. The Litigation Account Management System (LAMS) is a sub-system within AIS used to monitor compliance for all debtors in Chapters 11, 12, and 13. LAMS generates a report to match closed cases on AIS with unreversed TC 520s on IDRS. This report should be worked timely to identify violations of the automatic stay. Through LAMS timely reviews can be made when working on large dollar and chronic repeater cases.

    Note:

    IRM 5.9.12.8,Litigation Account Management System, provides instructions for working LAMS reports.

  6. TC 136 BMF Monitoring. The use of TC 136 assists Insolvency when monitoring for Business Master File (BMF) compliance. For compliance monitoring, the Insolvency Interface Program (IIP) inputs a systemic TC 136 reflecting the Last Return Amount Code of "1."

    1. The input of TC 136 suppresses both litigation transcripts for TC 650 and FTD alerts.

    2. An FTD-FIDUC transcript is generated when a systemic check discloses substantial under-depositing.

    3. When systemic monitoring is no longer necessary, TC 137 should be input.

  7. Large Dollar/Chronic Delinquency Cases. In lieu of systemic monitoring, Insolvency should consider one or all of the following when monitoring large dollar or chronic repeater cases:

    1. Periodic manual monitoring on IDRS (as established by local management guidelines);

    2. Verification of timely tax deposits on Form 6123 (sent to Insolvency); and, if necessary,

    3. Issuance of Letter 986, requiring the DIP to file monthly returns.

  8. Request for Payment. If the debtor's tax delinquencies continue, the Insolvency caseworker may consider listing the liabilities on Form 6338-A, Request for Payment of Internal Revenue Taxes, and filing that form with the court. For cases commencing on or after October 17, 2005, under 11 USC § 503(b)(1)(D), the Service is not required to file a request for the payment of administrative expense taxes and related penalties. However, depending upon local court practices, the Service may find it beneficial to continue to file administrative claims to establish a basis for a motion for conversion or dismissal. If both an administrative claim and a motion to convert or dismiss are required, they should be filed concurrently. Insolvency should consult Counsel for guidance.

    1. If using Form 6338-A, the caseworker should send a copy to the debtor and debtor's attorney, including a letter advising them the IRS will request a motion to convert or dismiss the case if the non-compliance is not cured by the specified target date.

    2. Annotated on the Request for Payment form should be an estimate of the current tax period liability and an estimate of the amount due on any unfiled returns.

  9. Referral. If the delinquency is not resolved, and the arrearage justifies a referral, the Insolvency caseworker should immediately refer the case to Counsel for court intervention. For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1112(b)(4)(I) expressly provides as grounds for conversion, dismissal, or appointment of a trustee the debtor's failure to timely pay taxes owed after the date of the order for relief or to file tax returns due after the date of the order for relief. Additionally, under 11 USC 521(j)(2), within 90 days after the request to dismiss or convert is filed by the Service, the court "shall convert or dismiss the case, whichever is in the best interests of creditors and the estate," should the debtor not file the required return(s). The referral to Counsel must include the debtor's full TINs.

    Note:

    If the dollar amounts involved do not meet LEM 5.9.4 criteria, caseworkers should consult local Counsel for guidance on how best to address the debtor's noncompliance in regard to payment and filing returns.

  10. Conversion Limitations. Generally, a Chapter 11 case can be converted or dismissed either voluntarily by the debtor in most circumstances or involuntary by request of a party in interest. However, for three types of debtors, the court is prevented from converting a case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7, except when requested by the debtor. In instances involving these special debtors, the court may only dismiss the case (assuming grounds exist to do so). The three types of debtors listed under 11 USC § 1112(c) are:

    1. a farmer;

    2. a corporation which is not moneyed, business or commercial; or

    3. any entity not eligible to file Chapter 7.

5.9.8.11.1  (01-01-2006)
Postpetition Debts - Chapter 11 Individuals

  1. Postpetition Liabilities - Individuals. In an individual Chapter 11 case, the debtor and the bankruptcy estate represent two separate taxable entities. (See IRM 5.9.8.13, Internal Revenue Code § 1398 Issues, for further information.) Any postpetition liability incurred by the individual debtor may not be claimed in the bankruptcy proceeding. However, for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1115 provides property of the estate includes personal service income when the debtor is an individual. Until the implication of this section is clarified, a referral to Counsel may be required for determinations as to whether personal service income should be reported on Form 1040, taxable to the debtor, or Form 1041, taxable to the estate.

  2. BAPCPA and Individual's Postpetition Liabilities. For cases filed prior to October 17, 2005, no stay of collection is placed on the individual's postpetition debts. Such debts can be collected from non-estate assets, such as exempt assets and the individual debtor’s postpetition wages. Collection of these accounts is not to be suspended. However, for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, an individual's postpetition income is considered part of the bankruptcy estate and should not be levied without concurrence of Counsel.

  3. Income From Business. When an individual debtor operates a business as a sole proprietorship, or if the business is solely owned by the debtor, it may not be clear whether income from the business is property of the estate or the debtor’s separate postpetition income. In such cases, Insolvency should consult local Counsel.

5.9.8.12  (05-13-2008)
Chapter 11 No Liability Cases

  1. Significant Bankruptcy Cases. Cases meeting the Significant Bankruptcy Case Processing Procedures criteria in IRM 5.9.4.13.3,Referrals on Significant Bankruptcy Case Issues, must be referred to Counsel upon initial case review regardless of a "no liability" determination.

    Note:

    Significant cases or cases referred to TEGE are not to be closed on AIS without express consent from Counsel or TEGE.

  2. No Liability Closures - Caution. If a "no liability" determination is made in a Chapter 11 case, caution must be exercised in early closure of the case. Closure, in all instances, must conform with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to protect the debtor's rights.

  3. Required Research. At a minimum, current research must be done which shows:

    • no balance due periods

    • no pending assessments

    • no unfiled returns

    • no pending examinations

    • no potential liability to the IRS indicated by the plan review

    • debtor is current for at least a minimum of two consecutive postpetition quarters (BMF taxes)

    • no other issues requiring Insolvency's attention

  4. Plan or Disclosure Statement Received After Case Closure. If the Service receives an amended disclosure statement or plan after closing a no liability Chapter 11 case, Insolvency should conduct another liability review taking any necessary actions, which may include reopening the case on AIS .

5.9.8.13  (05-13-2008)
Internal Revenue Code § 1398 Issues

  1. Special Tax Provisions. IRC § 1398 contains special tax provisions for an individual filing Chapter 11. For an individual who files bankruptcy under Chapter 11 provisions, two taxpayers exist postpetition:

    1. The trustee or debtor-in-possession files a return (Form 1041) for all income which belongs to the estate; and

    2. The individual debtor files a return (Form 1040) for all income of the debtor which is not part of the estate.

      Note:

      These same provisions are applicable to individual Chapter 7 cases. (See IRM 5.9.6.15,Bankruptcy Estate Income Taxes.)

  2. Postpetition Property under BAPCPA. For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1115 makes property acquired by an individual debtor postpetition property of the estate, as in Chapter 13 cases. But, unlike in Chapter 13 cases, the bankruptcy estate of an individual in Chapter 11 is a separate taxable entity. Gross earnings from a Chapter 11 debtor's performance of services and gross income from property (s)he acquired once the petition was filed must be included in the bankruptcy estate's gross income, not in the debtor's gross income. If the debtor is self-employed, the debtor remains responsible for paying the self-employment tax on postpetition income on his or her individual Form 1040 schedule SE, even though that income must be reported on the estate’s return for income tax purposes. Counsel Notice 2006-83, 2006-40 IRB 1 provides detailed guidance on property of the bankruptcy estate for individuals filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy on or after October 17, 2005.

    Note:

    BAPCPA does not affect the application of employment and withholding taxes for a Chapter 11 debtor.

  3. Individuals Can Terminate Tax Year. Although the practice is not common, individuals may elect to terminate their tax year when the bankruptcy petition is filed.

    1. If this election is made, the tax year is terminated as of the day before the bankruptcy filing, which will result in the debtor's filing two "short-year" returns. This election is made by filing the first short year return on or before the due date, which is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the first short year.

    2. The debtor must write at the top of the first short year return: SECTION 1398 ELECTION. At the top of the second short year return, the debtor must write: SECOND SHORT YEAR RETURN AFTER SECTION 1398 ELECTION.

      Note:

      The election can also be made by filing an extension to file on or before the due date of this return.

    3. The spouse can join in this election. If the spouse does join, a joint return must be filed for the first short year. If the spouse does not join, a joint return cannot be filed for that year.

    4. If an individual files Chapter 11 and makes the IRC § 1398 election, the spouse may join in this election. If the spouse subsequently files Chapter 11, the second filing creates a second IRC § 1398 election opportunity. If the election should be made again, three short year returns are required.

    5. Once this election is made, it may not be changed unless the case is dismissed. (See paragraph (4) below.)

  4. Bankruptcy Estate in Individual Chapter 11 Case. The bankruptcy estate in an individual Chapter 11 case is a separate taxable entity. A separate Employer's Identification Number must be obtained for the estate.

    1. An income tax return must be filed on Form 1041 if the estate has sufficient income to meet the filing requirements. The 1041 filing requirements are the total of the amount of one exemption plus the standard deduction for a married person filing separately.

    2. The estate may initially choose its own taxable period (i.e., when its first tax year ends) as long as the initial period does not exceed one year.

    3. The DIP or the trustee must determine what portion of income, deductions, and/or credits belongs to the individual debtor and what portion belongs to the estate. For cases of individuals filed prior to October 17, 2005, earnings from personal services performed by the debtor after the petition date are not part of the estate and should be included on the individual's Form 1040. For cases of individuals filed on or after October 17, 2005, property and earnings acquired postpetition are property of the estate, as in Chapter 13 cases. See IRM 5.9.8.11.1, Postpetition Debts - Chapter 11 Individuals, and 11 USC § 1115 for further information. Income derived from assets of the estate should be reported on the estate's Form 1041.

      Example:

      A loss derived from rental property that is property of the estate would not be available to reduce the debtor's 1040 income as the rental property is part of the estate, and the loss should be reported on the estate's Form 1041.

    4. Also, the bankruptcy estate will succeed to and take into account any prepetition net operating loss (NOL) available to the individual. The NOL will become part of the estate when the petition is filed and will not be available to the individual so long as the estate exists. When the estate terminates, any remaining net operating loss will revert to the individual, but first it must be reduced by the amount of any discharged debt. (See IRC § 108.)

    5. A joint bankruptcy petition actually creates two bankruptcy estates – unless the court has substantively consolidated the estates. If the estates have not been consolidated, two 1041 obligations exist.

    6. Local Insolvency offices should consider sending a locally devised letter to individual Chapter 11 debtors and trustees advising them of these opportunities and their resultant tax responsibilities.

    7. If the Chapter 11 case is subsequently dismissed, the effect is as if a bankruptcy petition was never filed. Therefore, the debtor must file amended returns to replace any short year returns filed or 1041s filed.

5.9.8.14  (03-01-2007)
Disclosure Statements and Plans of Reorganization

  1. Requirement. Chapter 11 is the only chapter of the Bankruptcy Code requiring a disclosure statement to accompany a proposed plan of reorganization.

  2. Clarifies Plan. The disclosure statement may be brief or lengthy, but it should generally explain what the proposed plan means to particular creditors and to other interested parties. The contents of this statement are not binding on the IRS in the way a plan is, but the approval process for the disclosure statement provides the IRS with an opportunity to explore relevant facts regarding the debtor and to clarify any plan issues.

  3. Tax Consequences. The requirement that the disclosure statement provide "adequate information " to creditors to enable them to make a reasonable and informed judgement about the plan (11 USC § 1125(a)(1)) has been amended by BAPCPA for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, to include a discussion of the potential federal tax consequences not only to the debtor, but also to any successor to the debtor, or a typical "hypothetical investor." Among other issues, plans providing for liquidation or the sale of property should be reviewed for the tax impact.

    Caution:

    Any discussion of tax consequences in the disclosure statement should be reviewed to ensure that no language is included purporting to bind the Service.

  4. Notice of Hearing. Once the debtor submits a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization, the court schedules a hearing on the disclosure statement, sending a notice of the hearing to all creditors. Immediately upon receipt of this notice, the Insolvency caseworker should request a copy of both documents, usually from the debtor's attorney, or review them from PACER access, if available. If mailed, these documents should be sent directly to the Field Insolvency office rather than to the national Insolvency post office address.

  5. Insolvency Review. The Insolvency caseworker should review the claim and the case file to determine if new tax liabilities have accrued and if all prepetition liabilities have been included on the claim. The claim should be amended as appropriate. This review will also identify if administrative tax liabilities have been incurred. If so, an administrative claim may be filed. However, pursuant to 11 USC § 1112(b) as amended by BAPCPA, failure to timely pay taxes owed after the petition date or to file tax returns after the petition date is cause for dismissal or conversion without the necessity of an administrative claim. ( See IRM 5.9.8.11, Postpetition/Preconfirmation BMF Monitoring.)

  6. Lien and Equity Issues. If the IRS has filed a secured claim, schedules must be reviewed to determine if the equity to which the lien attaches is at least equal to the claim. If the equity is less than the secured claim, the portions of the claim to be reclassified as unsecured priority or unsecured general must be calculated and the claim amended accordingly. (See IRM 5.9.13.19.2, Secured Claim.)

  7. Objections. The disclosure statement must provide sufficient information for the reviewer to make a judgment about the plan. Comparison of debtors' schedules and statements of affairs should be made against other financial information, such as Accurint or Form 433A. IRS will usually object to the disclosure statement only if it is grossly deficient and if major plan objections are identified. Insolvency and local Counsel should establish guidelines regarding objections to disclosure statements.

5.9.8.14.1  (03-01-2007)
The Small Business Election

  1. The Small Business Debtor. For cases filed prior to October 17, 2005, the small business debtor or "fast track" election was optional. A "fast track " Chapter 11 bankruptcy accelerates the plan confirmation process by an eligible small business debtor. Under BAPCPA the small business debtor provision is no longer optional for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005. Generally, the small business provisions will apply to Chapter 11 business debtors whose noncontingent, liquidated debts do not exceed $2 million (excluding any debts owed to affiliates and insiders) and where the US Trustee has not appointed an unsecured creditors committee or the court has determined the committee of unsecured creditors is not sufficiently active and representative to provide effective oversight of the debtor. Most Chapter 11 business debtors will fall within this debt limit as "fast track" bankruptcies (11 USC § 101(51D)).

  2. Pre-BAPCPA "Fast Track" Bankruptcies. A "fast track" Chapter 11 bankruptcy accelerates the plan confirmation process by an eligible debtor's electing to be treated as a small business. In "fast track" cases filed prior to October 17, 2005, the debtor may file a plan within 100 days after the date of the order for relief. All plans must be filed within 160 days after the date of the order for relief. Under certain conditions, these timeframes may be reduced or increased by the bankruptcy court.

  3. BAPCPA "Fast Track" Bankruptcies. For "fast track" cases commencing on or after October 17, 2005, the debtor may file a plan within the first 180 days after the date of the order for relief, and all plans must be filed within 300 days after the date of the order for relief. Under certain conditions, these timeframes may be reduced or increased by the bankruptcy court (11 USC § 1121(e)).

  4. Court-Conditional Approval. For cases filed both before and after the effective date of BAPCPA, the court can conditionally approve the disclosure statement, subject to final approval after notice and a hearing, and the DIP may solicit acceptances and rejections based on the conditionally approved disclosure statement, so long as the conditionally approved disclosure statement is mailed 10 days (pre-BAPCPA) or 25 days (BAPCPA) before the date of the plan confirmation hearing. Also, for small business cases, a hearing on the disclosure statement may be combined with a hearing on confirmation regardless of when the petition was filed. Finally, for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, the court may determine the plan provides adequate information and a separate disclosure statement is not necessary, and it may approve a disclosure statement submitted on standard forms approved by the court (11 USC § 1125(f)).

  5. Monitoring the Small Business Debtor. Provisions applicable to the small business debtor are designed to be less cumbersome to these debtors and move the case more quickly to confirmation. Because BAPCPA has made the small business provisions mandatory, the Service will receive more of these cases where:

    • the debtor has solicited acceptances of a plan prior to filing the petition

    • the debtor has filed a request to eliminate the § 341 hearing

    • the court has determined that a separate disclosure statement is not necessary

    It is incumbent upon Service personnel to monitor the debtor's case especially with regard to postpetition tax compliance as the timeframes in which the Service can react have been greatly contracted.

    Note:

    11 USC § 362(n) provides the automatic stay will not apply in certain small business debtor cases. Generally, the stay will not apply where the small business debtor had a previous case that was dismissed, or the plan was confirmed, within two years of the present case.

5.9.8.14.2  (03-01-2007)
The Plan of Reorganization

  1. Negotiations. The Bankruptcy Code prescribes minimal requirements for the structure and confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan. However, the final format of the plan results from negotiations among the debtor and its creditors. The IRS risks losing its rights under the law unless Insolvency monitors the development and feasibility of proposed Chapter 11 plans prior to confirmation hearings.

  2. Quality Plan Reviews/Timely Objections. Chapter 11 plans may fail to provide properly for the Service's claims, so the Service must review these plans carefully and in a timely manner. The Service should consider objecting to deficient plans. IRM 5.9.5.4.(4),Chapters 11 and 12 Plan Documentation, provide the format to be followed in documenting a Chapter 11 plan summary on AIS.

  3. Plan Provisions. The plan must provide, as follows:

    1. Administrative Expenses. Any unpaid administrative expense claims must be paid in full on the effective date of the plan (if not stated in the plan, generally considered to be the confirmation date) unless the claim holder agrees to different treatment as required by 11 USC § 1129(a)(9)(A). The IRS rarely agrees to different treatment. (See paragraph (8) below.) The Service should claim all administrative expense taxes on a Request for Payment filed prior to confirmation to avoid the debtor's contention that any such non-claimed taxes are discharged by confirmation. Further, plans should be reviewed to ensure they provide a mechanism for the payment of postpetition, preconfirmation tax periods where returns are not yet due. Plans typically set a bar date for administrative expense requests, but the Service may not be aware of a preconfirmation liability because a return has not been filed. Insolvency should negotiate for plan language allowing such taxes to pass through bankruptcy unaffected. Insolvency specialists or advisors should consult with Counsel if problems arise. If the debtor will not agree, the Service may have to object to the plan or file a protective administrative expense request.

      Caution:

      Failure to file a timely request for payment for cases commencing prior to October 17, 2005, presents substantial risk the court will hold such administrative taxes to have been discharged notwithstanding 11 USC §§ 1129(a)(9)(a) and 503.

    2. Administrative Expenses - under BAPCPA. For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 503(b)(1)(D) now provides a governmental unit is not required to file a request for payment of administrative expenses taxes. See also 28 USC § 960, which generally requires taxes to be paid on or before the due date of the tax under applicable nonbankruptcy law. Further, 11 USC § 1116(6)(A) requires, in the case of small business debtors, the debtor must timely file tax returns and (B) timely pay all taxes entitled to administrative expense priority. 11 USC § 1112 (b)(4)(I) makes the failure to file or pay postpetition taxes an express reason for dismissal or conversion. Thus, debtors should be paying their postpetition tax obligations in the ordinary course of their business pursuant to the tax laws. While the Service is not required to claim administrative taxes on a Form 6338-A, use of this form may be appropriate to put the debtor on notice as to the delinquent taxes and returns. Additionally, filing of the "admin" claim may serve to make the case a matter of tax administration and will alert other interested parties of non-compliance. If both an administrative claim and a motion to dismiss are required, they should be filed with the court concurrently. The debtor's failure to file the postpetition returns or pay the postpetition taxes will require Counsel intervention.

    3. Secured Claims and Protection of the Government's Interests. Secured claims should be paid in full within a reasonable amount of time with interest accruing from the effective date of the plan. For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, where, absent the security interest, the secured claim would be priority under 11 USC § 507(a)(8), the secured claim will be treated in the same manner as a priority claim. (See 11 USC § 1129(a)(9)(D), and list item (j) below. )

    4. Rate of Interest for Tax Claims. For cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, the interest rate on tax claims paid under the plan is set at the IRC § 6621 rate for the calendar month the plan is confirmed per 11 USC § 511.

      Note:

      Under IRC 6621(c) the Service is due and should seek the normal underpayment interest rate plus two percent as the interest rate to be paid for large corporate underpayments.

    5. Full Payment Provision. The Service should generally insist the plan, at a minimum, provide for full payment of secured claims before the collection period is due to expire, absent the IRC § 6503(h) suspension. If a provision for payment within this time cannot be obtained, the plan should be modified to include language clarifying the collection period will be suspended pursuant to IRC § 6503(h)(2). ( See IRM 5.9.8.9, Collection Statute of Limitations and Chapter 11 Plans.)

    6. Collection Suspension and the Individual in Chapter 11. For individuals in Chapter 11 who file bankruptcy on or after October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1141(d)(5) generally provides that confirmation of the plan does not discharge any debt provided for in the plan until the court grants a discharge after the debtor has completed all payments required under the plan. Therefore, the collection statute is extended on periods covered under the plan.

    7. Lien Retention Provision. The plan must contain a provision that the Service's lien, relating to any secured claim, will be retained until the plan is completed. This is because 11 USC § 1141(c) provides, with limited exceptions, the property dealt with by the plan is free and clear of all claims of creditors once the plan is confirmed, unless the plan provides otherwise.

    8. Oversecured Claim. If the value of the collateral exceeds the amount of the claim (the Service's secured claim is oversecured), the plan should provide for interest on the claim from the petition date (11 USC § 506(b)).

    9. Pre-BAPCPA Unsecured Priority Claims. For cases filed prior to October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1129(a)(9)(C) provided, unless the creditor agrees to a different treatment, unsecured priority claims must be paid in full, in cash, within six years of assessment, including interest on the claim from the effective date of the plan to the date of payment.

      Caution:

      Plan reviewers should be on the alert for plans providing for payments over six years from the effective date of the plan rather than six years from the date of assessment.

    10. Unsecured Priority Claims under BAPCPA. Payments on cases filed on or after October 17, 2005, must be regular installment payments in cash, with post-confirmation interest, over a period not later than five years after the petition date. The payment schedule may not be less favorable than the most favored unsecured general claim provided for by the plan except for 11 USC § 1122(b) creditors.

      Note:

      11 USC § 1122(b) creditors file small unsecured general claims that may be paid separately in a lump sum for convenience sake.

    11. Unsecured General Claims. Unsecured general claims are not required to be paid in full, nor do they receive postpetition interest. However, general creditors must be paid an amount at least equal to that which the creditors would have received under Chapter 7, in accordance with 11 USC § 1129(a)(7). An unsecured claim should be filed by the Service if unsecured amounts are due the IRS and the LEM 5.9.13 dollar criterion is met. The general unsecured claims of the IRS must be treated in the same manner as all other general unsecured claims.

      Note:

      Plans may divide general claims into categories by amount and provide for more prompt disposition of smaller claims. In such cases, the reviewer may consider, with managerial concurrence, reducing the general claim for more prompt "up front" payments and disposition, depending on the terms and amounts. (See paragraph (8) below.)

    12. Default Provisions. During plan negotiations a default provision should be obtained, specifying non-dischargeability of federal tax liabilities until paid and permitting administrative collection action upon default. This forms a significant aspect of the plan in light of the high default rate of Chapter 11 plans. Without a provision in the plan outlining remedies upon default, the Service is left with an uncertain legal position which could lead to litigation. In some cases, the default language may include provisions to convert or dismiss upon plan default.

    13. Default Language. The following model language can be modified to fit local practice or the circumstances of a particular case:
      "If the reorganized debtor substantially defaults on the payments of a tax due to the IRS under the plan, the entire tax debt still owed to the IRS shall become due and payable immediately, and the IRS may collect these unpaid tax liabilities through the administrative collection provisions of the Internal Revenue Code."

      Note:

      This language should be modified for cases of individuals filed after October 17, 2005, since the discharge in such cases does not usually occur until after completion of payments under the plan.

  4. Full Plan Review Critical. In addition to reviewing the plan to ensure it adequately provides for the Service's claims, the entire plan must be evaluated to determine if it includes provisions detrimental to the government. Plans providing for liquidation or the sale of property should be reviewed for the tax impact. (See IRM 5.9.4.5.1, Sale of Property Considerations.)

  5. Plan Review "Red Flags. " No list can be all inclusive, but Insolvency must exercise caution when plan provisions are reviewed, and any of the following factors are noted:

    • Balloon payments. While irregular or fluctuating payments may be acceptable for a seasonal business, IRS should object to plans providing for a large final payment, and/or designating how the payments are to be applied.

    • Designating payments to trust fund taxes first

    • Discharge-like releases and/or injunctions in favor of non-debtor third parties, such as officers of the debtor corporation

    • Distribution of property to the government in lieu of cash

    • Excessive time periods between confirmation and the effective date

    • Excessive time to cure any default in the plan

    • Giving any third party, such as the creditor’s committee, the right to delay payment to any creditor

    • Language which purports to change or conclusively determine tax consequences under the IRC

    • Payment of interest for only a portion of the claim

    • Payment of secured claims for periods longer than the required six year (or five, depending upon the petition date) period for priority claims

    • Providing for payment over several years, but not providing for equal monthly payments

    • Providing for large immediate cash payments to general creditors but payments over time to priority creditors

    • Provisions giving general unsecured creditors more favorable treatment than priority creditors

    • Provisions dealing with any post-confirmation taxes or bringing post-confirmation matters under court jurisdiction

    • Creation of a post-confirmation trust, funded by assets of the bankruptcy estate

    • Unrealistically short administrative claim bar dates

    • For cases commenced on or after October 17, 2005, any provision requiring the filing of an administrative expense claim for taxes

    • Any other provision which jeopardizes the government’s interests

  6. Deficient Plans - General. If the plan does not meet minimum requirements for payment under the Bankruptcy Code, or other serious concerns arise, the Insolvency caseworker should advise the debtor’s attorney of the deficiencies and negotiate an acceptable plan. The changes will then be included in an amended plan or in the order confirming the plan. In any event, the agreed-upon changes must be in writing.

  7. Deficient Plans - Exceptions. If a proposed plan of reorganization does not provide for the payment of the IRS's claims as required under the Bankruptcy Code, the Insolvency specialist or advisor should negotiate with opposing counsel regarding acceptable provisions whenever possible. If the debtor can demonstrate acceptance of a deficient plan is in the best interests of the government, the case should be referred to Counsel recommending acceptance of the plan in lieu of objection.

    Note:

    This recommendation may be made only if no other creditor benefits to the detriment of the Service. Management and Counsel must concur with this recommendation.

  8. Prompt Objections. If opposing counsel is unresponsive, unable to demonstrate acceptance of a deficient plan is in the government's best interests, or the interests of the government are at risk, a referral to the appropriate office should be made promptly for the filing of an objection to the plan.

  9. Objection Contents. The referral must state what actions, if any, were taken to negotiate with opposing counsel and factors considered in rejecting any settlement proposals, such as:

    • the debtor did not demonstrate acceptance of a deficient plan is in the government's best interest

    • insufficient information was provided by the debtor to make a determination

    • the debtor's payment proposals are not feasible

    • the tax claims are non-dischargeable and full collection is likely outside of bankruptcy

  10. Written Notice to Debtor. After an acceptable plan has been filed and confirmed, Insolvency should advise the debtor in writing of the amount of the required payments if the amounts are not specified with clarity in the plan.

  11. Individual Debtor and Non-Dischargeable Taxes. If the bankruptcy is an individual case, the debtor and the debtor's attorney should be advised in writing of any non-dischargeable liabilities which will survive the proceeding and will be collectible after the stay is lifted. (But see IRM 5.9.8.15(8).)

5.9.8.15  (03-01-2007)
The Chapter 11 Discharge and the Effects of Confirmation

  1. Bankruptcy Estate upon Confirmation. For individual debtors filing prior to October 17, 2005, or business debtors regardless of the petition date, all property of the bankruptcy vests in the debtor upon confirmation unless the plan or the confirmation order provides otherwise in accordance with 11 USC § 1141(b), and the automatic stay is terminated (11 USC § 362(c)). For individual debtors filing on or after October 17, 2005, property acquired by the debtor postpetition becomes property of the estate as in Chapter 13 cases, and the automatic stay remains in effect until the court closes the case or lifts the stay.

  2. Effective Date of Plan. The effective date of the plan is usually defined in the plan itself. If not, the effective date is the date the confirmation order becomes final.

  3. Plan Confirmation Binding. A Chapter 11 plan is confirmed when the court enters an order confirming the plan. Confirmation binds the debtor and creditors to the terms of the plan.

    Caution:

    Insolvency should scrutinize the order confirming the plan to ensure the individual debtor filing prior to October 17, 2005, or the business debtor received a discharge and property did vest in the debtor at the time of confirmation.

  4. Discharge. For cases commenced prior to October 17, 2005, 11 USC § 1141(d) provided confirmation of the plan discharges the debtor from any debt arising before the date of confirmation (subject to the exceptions under 11 USC § 523 for individual debtors), unless the plan or confirmation order provides otherwise. BAPCPA has amended this Bankruptcy Code section to state an individual debtor who files on or after October 17, 2005, generally does not receive a discharge upon confirmation. Rather, the individual receives a discharge after completion of payments as in Chapter 13 cases. Also, as with Chapter 13 cases, the court could grant the individual a hardship discharge in appropriate circumstances (11 USC § 1141(d)(5)).

  5. Automatic Stay Terminated. The automatic stay is usually terminated at confirmation for business debtors and individuals who filed prior to October 17, 2005, and TC 520 closing codes input to comply with the automatic stay are released. Generally, TC 520 CC 81 is input on these accounts when the stay is lifted.

    Note:

    The automatic stay against acts to collect from property of the estate only ends when the property is no longer property of the estate, per 11 USC § 362(c).

  6. Non-Discharge. Confirmation does not discharge a debtor if the debtor is an individual whose proceeding commenced on or after October 17, 2005. (The debtor receives a discharge after completion of the plan.) Also, per 11 USC § 1141(d)(6) confirmation does not discharge a debtor that is a corporation from certain debts, including a tax for which the debtor made a fraudulent return or willfully attempted to evade or defeat. Finally, confirmation does not discharge any debtor if:

    1. the plan provides for liquidation of all or substantially all property of the estate;

    2. the debtor does not engage in business after the confirmation of the plan; and

    3. the debtor would be denied a discharge in Chapter 7. In practice, this usually applies to corporations and partnerships which are not eligible for discharge in Chapter 7. However, it may also include other debtors who 1) have committed fraud; 2) have not been open and truthful during the proceeding; or 3) have been previously granted discharges within six years of filing the present petition. A discharge hearing is normally required to determine if a discharge should be denied for these reasons.

  7. Individuals/Certain Taxes Not Discharged. Confirmation in a Chapter 11 case does not discharge an individual debtor from certain taxes, in accordance with 11 USC § 523(a). If the non-dischargeable taxes are paid in the proceeding, the accruals not paid will survive the proceeding and be collectible after confirmation.

  8. Non-Collection Outside of Plan. Although confirmation does not discharge an individual debtor from taxes excepted from discharge under 11 USC § 523(a), the IRS will not attempt to collect non-discharged prepetition taxes outside of the plan unless:

    1. a substantial default has occurred;

    2. circumstances allowing collection through setoff arise, or;

    3. the plan does not provide for full payment of the non-dischargeable taxes.

5.9.8.16  (01-01-2006)
Post-Confirmation Actions

  1. Actions. The following post-confirmation actions should be taken on cases filed by individual debtors prior to October 17, 2005, or business debtors regardless of their filing date:

    1. TC 520 CC 81 is generally input on all modules covered by the plan.

    2. After verifying TC 520 CC 81 has posted, any TC 520s with other closing codes must be reversed and TC 137 input on all accounts having a TC 136.

    3. Any unassessed deficiencies or unpostable returns should be assessed as appropriate with the exception stated in paragraph (2) below.

  2. BAPCPA. For individual debtors whose bankruptcies commence on or after October 17, 2005, no special actions are required. The TC 520 code should not be changed without a specific need to do so, and unassessed deficiencies on prepetition periods cannot be posted.

5.9.8.16.1  (01-01-2006)
Disposition of Acquired Property

  1. Disposing of Acquired Property. If property is received in accordance with the plan, the plan should be reviewed for restrictions or considerations that inhibit disposing of the property. If none is identified, the property should be treated similarly to property acquired by redemption, including recording any deeds, certificates of title or similar documents, and then selling the acquired property. (See IRM 5.10.5,Sale Procedures.)

5.9.8.16.2  (03-01-2007)
Monitoring the Plan and Reviewing for Lien Refile

  1. AIS Follow-up. Insolvency caseworkers must monitor plans after confirmation to ensure debtors are making required payments to the IRS.

  2. Monitoring Timeframe. AIS follow-up should be set appropriately. In most cases, this should be done at least quarterly.

    Caution:

    To ensure protection of the government's interests in large dollar cases, and in cases of unusual complexities and/or sensitivity, monitoring should be conducted monthly.

  3. Plan Payments Review. To monitor the debtor's payments under the plan effectively, Insolvency must review and identify the terms governing the IRS payments, including:

    • amount of payments

    • date of payments

    • default provisions

    • claim classifications

    • frequency and regularity of payments

    • amount of any arrearage

    • interest rate for cases filed prior to October 17, 2005

    • interest rate (normal underpayment interest rate plus two percent) on large corporate balances due for cases filed on or after October 17, 2005

    • payments to general unsecured creditors

    • length of time to pay the claim

    • projected date of discharge for individuals in cases filed on or after October 17, 2005

    • special conditions

  4. Application of Payments. Payments should be applied to the claim for which the payment was received, whether secured, priority, or general. In addition, the payment must be applied in accordance with the plan if specified. Otherwise, the payments will be applied in the best interests of the government. (See IRM 5.9.15,Payments in Bankruptcy.)

  5. Payment Follow-up. After the receipt of each plan payment, the caseworker must annotate the AIS history with the dollar amount of the next expected payment and exactly how it is to be applied. This allows anyone to post the payment properly in the event the assigned caseworker is absent. A follow-up date must be input on the AIS letter screen to monitor for the next required payment.

  6. Lien Refile Review. During the window permitting lien refiles, when the Service's claim includes an unpaid secured claim, the caseworker must make a determination if a lien refile is appropriate. The results of the lien refile determination must be entered in the AIS history. (See IRM 5.9.5.9.2,Refiling of Liens.)

5.9.8.16.3  (05-13-2008)
Plan Default

  1. Default Notice. If plan payments have not been received as required, the following steps should be taken, as appropriate:

    1. The assigned specialist or advisor must attempt phone contact to the DIP or trustee to negotiate a cure for the plan. If phone contact is made and a cure cannot be agreed upon, the caseworker must advise the DIP/trustee that (s)he has five business days to become current or a default letter will be issued. If phone contact cannot be made in a reasonable period not to exceed five business days, a default letter should be issued to the DIP/trustee.

    2. Six business days after determining a cure cannot be agreed upon with the DIP/trustee, if the arrearage has not been cured, a pending default notice ("last-chance" letter) should be sent in accordance with the plan's default provisions. Or if reasonable attempts to contact the DIP/trustee by phone have been unsuccessful, the pending default notice should be sent.

      Note:

      Managerial approval is required before sending a default letter when prior phone contact has not been made. (Attempts to negotiate if numerous prior contacts have been made may be futile.)

    3. A date must be specified in the letter for the debtor to come into compliance with the plan provisions (for example, 30 days from the date of the "pending default" letter) including full remittance of plan payments to date and staying current on plan obligations.

    4. The letter must explain possible consequences of failing to cure the plan default.

    5. A default notification letter must be sent to the debtor and attorney if a debtor does not come into full compliance after the date given in the "last-chance" letter.

      Note:

      Even if the plan contains no default provisions, it is recommended a "last-chance" letter be sent to the debtor and the debtor's attorney when a potential default of the plan exists.

  2. Available Options. If the default is not cured by the time required in the plan or the default letter, available options include:

    1. administrative collection;

    2. a motion to convert or dismiss; or

    3. referral to Counsel to determine the proper legal action for the Service to take.

  3. Administrative Collection. Pursuant to IRM 5.9.8.5(7), Default Provisions, the Service should seek language in the plan specifying the Service can use administrative remedies upon default to collect liabilities provided for in the plan. Local procedures should be followed.

    1. Plan Language. If the plan provides specific default language, the Service and the debtor will be bound by that provision.

    2. Consult Counsel. If the plan has no provision specifying the Service's remedies upon default, the Service's options are less clear. Insolvency should consult Counsel for guidance with local practice and case law.

  4. Substantial Default. The Service can administratively collect the full amount of the liabilities provided for in a Chapter 11 plan when the debtor is in substantial default, such as where:

    1. the debtor has defaulted on a series of plan payments and has ceased making regular payments under the plan;

    2. the Service has sent a notice of default; and

    3. the debtor clearly will not cure the default in a reasonable time nor remain current on plan obligations.

    Note:

    In such cases, the debtor is no longer operating under the terms of the plan and has opted out of participation in the bankruptcy process.

  5. Payments Current/Arrearage Exists. When the debtor is behind on plan payments, but continues to make regular payments under the plan, administrative collection of only the past due payments, and not the entire amount due under the plan, may be appropriate.

    Example:

    If the debtor missed three $1,000 payments, but is making regular payments, the amount of arrearage, $3,000, can be administratively collected.

  6. Administrative Collection. If administrative collection is appropriate, and identifiable levy sources are found, consideration may be given to Insolvency's sending a modified notice of intention to levy. Otherwise, Form 2209 should be sent to field Collection for administrative collection of the defaulted amount, or the entire amount, as appropriate. Insolvency should consult with Counsel if this situation arises.

  7. Discharged Taxes. No attempts can be made to collect discharged taxes.

    • Corporate. Unless the plan provides otherwise, any pre-confirmation tax liabilities are discharged except as provided for in the plan pursuant to 11 USC § 1141(d) in corporate Chapter 11 cases.

    • Individual Pre-BAPCPA. In Chapter 11 cases filed by individuals prior to October 17, 2005, pre-confirmation liabilities are also discharged except as provided for in the plan with the exception of liabilities that are non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 USC § 523(a) and postpetition liabilities of the individual debtor (as opposed to the liabilities of the bankruptcy estate).

    • Individual under BAPCPA. Chapter 11 individual debtors whose bankruptcies commence on or after October 17, 2005, are not granted a discharge until completion of all payments under the plan unless the court finds hardship.

  8. Motions to Convert or Dismiss. When deciding to refer a case for a motion to convert or dismiss, Insolvency must consider each case separately. In some cases, administrative collection may not be feasible because of lack of assets, or the court may retain jurisdiction over the assets. In these instances conversion to a Chapter 7 proceeding may be appropriate. (See IRM 5.9.17.5, Dismissal.)

5.9.8.16.4  (01-01-2006)
Accrual of Post-Confirmation Tax Liabilities

  1. Tax Debts Arising After Confirmation. Liabilities incurred after the effective date of confirmation are not subject to the plan. They cannot be claimed in the proceeding, and Insolvency should not input any codes to suspend collection of these liabilities.

    Exception:

    If the plan or the order confirming the plan provides the property of the estate does not vest in the debtor (for example, if the property vests in a liquidating trust), Insolvency should suspend these accounts from collection and refer the case to Counsel.

  2. Insolvency/Counsel Assistance. Accounts Management, ACS, or field Collection personnel should proceed with appropriate collection activities on these accounts. However, if issues and questions arise at the field level, and/or if uncertainty exists on how to proceed, they must contact the assigned Field Insolvency caseworker for assistance. If the matter is complex, Insolvency should suspend these accounts from collection while the Insolvency caseworker requests advice from Counsel.

5.9.8.17  (01-01-2006)
Closing Chapter 11 Bankruptcies

  1. Reasons for Closure. Events that may close a Chapter 11 case are:

    • dismissal (including voluntary)

    • conversion to a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding

    • default of the payment plan

    • plan completion

  2. Closing Actions. IRM 5.9.17,Closing a Bankruptcy, provides information on closing of bankruptcies, including Chapter 11 cases.

    • IRM 5.9.17.10, IRM 5.9.17.11, and IRM 5.9.17.12 refer specifically to closing Chapter 11 bankruptcies.

    • IRM 5.9.17.13 discusses aspects of closing consolidated Chapter 11 filings.

    • IRM 5.9.17.16 has information on adjustments of the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty when the trust fund has been full paid in a corporate Chapter 11 plan.


More Internal Revenue Manual