Accessibility Skip to Top Navigation Skip to Main Content Home  |  Change Text Size  |  Contact IRS  |  About IRS  |  Site Map  |  Español  |  Help  

22.30.1  Stakeholder Partnerships, Education and Communication (Cont. 2)

22.30.1.3 
Volunteer Programs Overview

22.30.1.3.13 
Measures Reporting

22.30.1.3.13.7 
Disaster Record Reporting Guidelines

22.30.1.3.13.7.2  (10-01-2007)
Reporting Roles and Responsibilities for Disaster Outreach

  1. Territory managers or their representatives are asked to send an e-mail to the appropriate area analyst within 5 business days after completion of the special event. The e-mail must include:

    • The number of returns prepared

    • The number of SPEC volunteers and employees participating in the event

    • The date and event name

    • Location of the special event

    • The partner/organization hosting the event

  2. The Area will send reports by the 15th day of each month to Headquarters and a copy to O&A. The report periods are monthly based on calendar year, such as 1/1 – 1/31, due 2/15. Employee time and taxpayers assisted through outreach events prior to 1/1/07 will be reported by national headquarters.

  3. National headquarters will also be reporting all costs associated with development of products and distributions, travel, training (products and travel), and relocation of impacted employees. SPEC employees are reminded to use accurate program codes for travel related to disaster support.

22.30.1.3.14  (10-01-2011)
Quality Review Process

  1. VRPP-QIP is SPEC’s initiative to promote return preparation quality at volunteer sites. This integrated quality process engages SPEC employees, partners, and volunteers in increasing volunteer return preparation accuracy and consistency in site operations.

  2. The Five (5) Core Principles of the Quality Process are listed below:

    1. Communicate proactively the value of the quality improvement efforts to stakeholders.

    2. Provide support to partners to ensure all volunteers receive appropriate training.

    3. Provide volunteers and partners with a set of required and recommended Quality Site Requirements (QSRs).

    4. Ensure all participants in the volunteer preparation program understand their respective roles, and responsibilities to ensure accurate return preparation.

    5. Collaborate continually with stakeholders to assess the quality of the volunteer return preparation program.

  3. SPEC has created a comprehensive multi-tiered quality review process, types of reviews include: :

    • QSS Reviews (comprised of a site review and three return reviews)

    • Field Assistance Visits

    • Internal/External Referral Review

    • SPEC Shopping

    • Grant Financial Reviews

    • Grant Administrative Visits

  4. All review plans take into account the continuing operation of the site during the visit. Most site visits should be conducted between February 1 and April 15. However, visits can be conducted whenever the site is open. If the site coordinator is not available, conduct the review with the designated alternate.

  5. Most review results are entered into the SPEC Site Quality Database (SQD) by the reviewers. The SQD is located on the SPECTRM shared drive.

  6. SPEC provides all reviewers intensive training on effectively conducting reviews, capturing best practices, and providing constructive feedback to the site coordinator on how to improve potential problem areas.

22.30.1.3.14.1  (10-01-2011)
Review Types

  1. SPEC’s Quality Process relies on multi-tiered reviews including site reviews, return reviews, inter-rater reviews, and referral reviews in a comprehensive quality review process that includes all eight of the following:

    • 100 percent Return Quality reviews

    • 100 percent review of VITA and TCE grant partners

    • Quality Statistical Sample (QSS) Reviews

    • Field site visits

    • Post-filing season reviews

    • Partner Review

    • SPEC Shopping

22.30.1.3.14.2  (10-01-2011)
100 Percent Site Quality Reviews

  1. SPEC’s QSR requires each site to conduct a 100 percent review of every return prepared prior to the taxpayer leaving the site. SPEC evaluates the site's compliance to this requirement during QSS reviews . Beginning with the 2011 Filing Season, all VITA and TCE sites are required to use Form 13614-C, Intake and Interview and Quality Review Sheet, to complete each tax return and conduct the quality review.

22.30.1.3.14.3  (10-01-2011)
100 Percent Review of VITA and TCE Grant Partners

  1. SPEC territory offices are required to complete a review of at least one site affiliated with each of the VITA and TCE grant partners located in their territory. These reviews are unannounced and include a site review and at least three return reviews. The current list of VITA and TCE grant partners can be obtained from the GPO . VITA and TCE grant partners are also listed as a component of the area and territory comprehensive plan requirements; that may result in reviews being done at more than one site from each grant partner.

22.30.1.3.14.4  (10-01-2011)
Quality Statistical Sample (QSS) Reviews

  1. QSS reviews are conducted by the QSS cadre. QSS reviews result in the official SPEC accuracy measure of returns prepared at VITA and TCE sites. SOI Office selects a statistically valid random sample of VITA and TCE sites each year. These reviews are unannounced and consist of a site review and three return reviews. SPEC area offices should report to QPO any site that the territories believe will be jeopardized by an unannounced QSS review. To ensure an accurate measure of the quality of the reviews, a secondary review is conducted by QPO employees. The secondary reviews are identified by the SOI Office.

22.30.1.3.14.4.1  (10-01-2011)
Selecting QSS Cadre Reviewers

  1. QSS cadre reviewers are selected annually using a competitive personnel selection announcement for a temporary detail assignment to the QPO . Selected QSS reviewers are provided specialized training. One senior manager in the QPO manages the cadre. The QPO reports to the O&A.

22.30.1.3.14.4.2  (10-01-2011)
Selecting Sites for Review

  1. Each year, based on criteria established by SPEC, the SOI Office determines the number of randomly selected site reviews. The reviews are selected from the prior year site listing provided to SOI from O&A . This prior year return information is pulled from SPECTRM.

22.30.1.3.14.4.3  (10-01-2011)
Assigning Sites

  1. The QPO manager distributes and assigns the SOI selected sites to each QSS cadre reviewer. The distribution of sites is based on geographic location of both the site and the cadre reviewer to optimize the most effective cost savings to the government.

22.30.1.3.14.4.4  (10-01-2011)
Pre-Research

  1. Once the QSS reviewer receives his/her case assignments, they are required to conduct extensive preliminary research.

  2. The research includes accessing site and production information tools such as:

    • Third Party Data Store (TPDS)/ Employee User Portal(EUP)

    • SPECTRM

    • SERP

    • 1541 Report

    • Production Report from the vendor (if applicable)

    • SIDN Workbook Report

    • Results of prior years QSS reviews, if applicable

22.30.1.3.14.4.5  (10-01-2011)
Planning for the Reviews

  1. The QSS reviewer is responsible for determining if a site is open for the current filing season. All site visits must be scheduled and entered into the Quality SharePoint® by the last Friday in January. The QSS reviewer is responsible for any changes in their schedule and must keep the SharePoint® updated on a weekly basis.

22.30.1.3.14.4.6  (10-01-2011)
Return Review

  1. Return Review is a non-intrusive method to determine the accuracy of key elements of the tax return based on supporting documentation provided by the taxpayer. The determination is completed by comparing the volunteer prepared return to the taxpayer provided information captured during the intake and interview process. Form 6729-C is used to capture report results of sample return reviews.

  2. The goal is to complete the Return Review while the taxpayer is still present at the site, but after the return has gone through the site's Quality Review process. If a return is found to be inaccurate, the error or omission on the return will be captured on the Form 6729-C and then the return will be sent back to the preparer to be corrected.

  3. All Return Reviews should be selected from the available returns completed at the site on the day of the review on a random basis. Site representatives, volunteers, quality reviewers and tax consultants should refrain from “hand-picking” returns to be reviewed.

  4. The QSS reviewer must have the following in order to conduct the Return Review:

    • Completed return

    • Documentation verifying an intake and interview process, generally Form 13614 or approved partner alternative form

    • Form 6729-C, Return Review and Job Aid

    • Supporting documents such as proof of identity, SSN cards or ITIN acceptance letter, Form W-2, Form 1099, Form 1098, etc.

22.30.1.3.14.4.7  (10-01-2011)
Explaining the Visit to the Site Coordinator

  1. Upon entering the site, the QSS reviewer will identify themselves and thank the site coordinator for their participation in the VITA or TCE program and explain the review process. They will explain how QSS reviews are intended to determine site adherence to the QSR and the accuracy for return preparation.

22.30.1.3.14.4.8  (10-01-2011)
Taxpayer Notification

  1. Pub 4675, Acknowledgement of Return Review Participation, is used to secure the taxpayer's permission ro participate in the QSS review process. Publication 4675 explains the QSS review process including random selection of tax returns and removal of Personal Identifiable Information(PII) (names, address, banking routing information, contact numbers, etc.) from their return and supporting documents prior to submitting the return to headquarters. This publication is provided to a taxpayer after their return has been through the site’s quality review process, if any, and before the QSS return review is conducted.

22.30.1.3.14.4.9  (10-01-2011)
Selecting and Conducting the Return Reviews

  1. The QSS reviewer must randomly select the next available return coming out of the site's quality review process (if the site has a quality review process) and obtain the taxpayer’s permission to review their return. If the site does not conduct quality reviews, the QSS reviewer should proceed with conducting the return review. Do not allow the return to be selected by anyone else at the site. This process is followed until three returns have been reviewed. The reviewer will conduct a return review using Form 6729-R, QSS Return Review Sheet, and will reference the Form 6729-R job aid to determine the accuracy of the prepared return.

  2. Return reviews include but are not limited to:

    • Verifying the taxpayer's identity.

    • Confirming all questions on Form 13614-C have been answered.

    • Ensuring all supporting documents have been provided with the tax return.

    • Comparing Form 13614-C to the tax return in order to determine the accuracy of the tax return.

22.30.1.3.14.4.10  (10-01-2010)
Conducting the Site Review

  1. After three returns are reviewed, a site review should be performed to determine site adherence to the QSR using Form 6729, Site Review Sheet, and the Form 6729 job aid.

22.30.1.3.14.4.11  (10-01-2011)
Scanning and Redacting the Return

  1. Once the three return reviews are completed, if possible, prior to leaving the site, the names, Social Security Numbers, phone numbers, EIN, addresses, local business names, and any other identified PII should be redacted (removed) from the scanned returns and supporting documents.

  2. If the reviewer is unable to redact the PII from the return and supporting documents due to time limits, the un-redacted returns must be secured in a Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) folder on their computer prior to leaving the site. PII must be redacted prior to sending the case file to headquarters or uploading them to the Quality SharePoint .

    Note:

    Do not redact Dates of Birth (DOB) . Do not scan Social Security Cards or Identification.

22.30.1.3.14.4.12  (10-01-2011)
Verbal Feedback with Site Coordinator

  1. A preliminary verbal feedback discussion with the site coordinator will be conducted prior to leaving the site. The discussion will address observed best practices and the preliminary results of the return and site reviews. Site coordinators will be advised that the final report will be provided within two weeks. If areas of non-compliance to the quality site requirements are identified, corrective actions will be recommended to the site coordinator prior to leaving the site and included in the written feedback.

22.30.1.3.14.4.13  (10-01-2011)
Completing the Quality Database

  1. As soon as possible, the QSS reviewer must correctly enter Form 6729 , Site Review Sheet and Form 6729-R, QSS Return Review Sheet, into the Quality Database(QD) located in SPECTRM. A QD User Guide, located on the Quality Sharepoint, has been developed for instructions on how to access and input the results into the QD.

22.30.1.3.14.4.14  (10-01-2011)
Written Results

  1. Within two weeks, the final written results should be forwarded using the feedback template, which is located on the Quality SharePoint . Copies of Form 6729, Site Review Sheet, and Form 6729-R, QSS Return Review Sheet, must be attached to these results. Instructions for copying these forms are located on the Quality SharePoint® .

  2. This e-mail must not be sent using secured messaging since it will be shared with national and/or local partners. These results will be delivered to the following:

    • Territory Manager

    • Relationship Manager

    • Area Quality Analyst

    • Chief, QPO

    • National AARP, if applicable

    • Grant Program Office , if applicable

  3. This written feedback will consist of an e-mail with the results and any identified activities that includes, but are not limited to:

    • Identified best practices

    • Areas of weaknesses

    • QSR non-compliant issues

    • Inappropriate activities

    • Corrective actions provided to the site coordinator

    • Recommended follow-up actions for the Territory Manager/Relationship Manager

  4. As soon as possible, but no later than five business days after receiving the QSS reviewers e-mail results, the Relationship Manager will review the information and e-mail the same results and forms to the following:

    • Site coordinator,

    • Responsible partner,

    • AARP state coordinator, if applicable.

22.30.1.3.14.4.15  (10-01-2011)
Relationship Manager Follow-up Actions

  1. The Relationship Manager will complete any recommended corrective and/or follow-up actions if applicable and provide the Territory Manager and area quality analyst the status of the actions taken within seven business days from the date of receiving the feedback. The Relationship Manager’s corrective actions should be documented at the bottom of the results e-mail and forwarded back to the lead inter-rater reviewer.

  2. If additional corrective actions and/or recommended follow-up actions were not warranted or were unable to be performed, the reasons must be documented and forwarded in the same manner listed above.

22.30.1.3.14.4.16  (10-01-2011)
Lead Inter-rater Follow-up Actions

  1. The Lead Inter-rater will ensure a copy of the Relationship Manager corrective actions are included in the case file.

  2. If additional corrective actions and/or recommended follow-up actions were not warranted or were unable to be performed, the reasons must be documented and forwarded in the same manner and the Lead Inter-rater will document the case file.

22.30.1.3.14.4.17  (10-01-2011)
Electronic Files

  1. Files will be maintained electronically. Paper case files will only be used if the reviewer experiences scanner problems.

  2. The QSS reviewer will redact all PII from scanned tax returns and supporting documents prior to uploading the case file to the Quality SharePoint.

22.30.1.3.14.4.18  (10-01-2011)
Closing the Case File

  1. The QSS reviewer will upload the completed electronic case file to the SharePoint no later than seven business days from reviewer’s last day to edit forms. Paper case files will be mailed to Headquarters.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19  (10-01-2011)
Inter-rater (Secondary) Review

  1. Inter-rater reviews provide a secondary review of the QSS return reviews.

  2. Inter-rater reviewers will be certified in tax law to prepare returns at the advanced and military levels and any appropriate specialized tax law topics. The Inter-raters are required to conduct secondary level reviews, which include verifying the completeness of selected case files and determining the accuracy of the competed tax return. The results of these reviews will be used together with all QSS return reviews to determine the critical accuracy measure for VITA and TCE return reviews.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.1  (10-01-2011)
Selecting Inter-rater Reviewers

  1. Inter-rater reviewers are selected annually by the Chief, Quality Program Office (QPO) and must be knowledgeable in tax law and certified at the advanced and military levels and any other appropriate specialized tax law topics.

  2. Selected inter-rater reviewers receive specialized training on the procedures used to review a completed case file. One lead inter-rater from the Quality Program Office (QPO) provides direction and support to the inter-rater team. The team of inter-raters report to the Chief, QPO.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.2  (10-01-2011)
Selecting the Inter-rater Reviews

  1. Inter-rater return reviews are selected by the SOI using a random sample of all QSS return reviews planned for the current filing season .

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.3  (10-01-2011)
Assigning Reviews

  1. The Chief, QPO and Lead IRR (LIRR) distributes cases to each inter-rater. The IRR assigned to a case will review any selected return in the case.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.4  (10-01-2011)
Conducting the Inter-rater Reviews

  1. The accuracy of returns and the correctness of the case file are recorded on a Form 6729-I, Inter-rater Return Review Sheet. The Inter-rater completes Form 6729-I, for each Form 6729-R, QSS Return Review Sheet selected for review.

  2. The IRR uses the Form 6729-I job aid when conducting inter-rater reviews. The job aid contains line-by-line instructions on how to complete a thorough and accurate secondary level review.

  3. If any of the documents are missing or incomplete, the IRR will first search on the Quality SharePoint; if unable to locate the missing documents on the SharePoint, the inter-rater will then contact the reviewer.

  4. The IRR will redact any un-redacted PII in both the SharePoint and the IRR working copy of the case file. If paper case files are submitted, the IRR will scan the paper file to convert it to an electronic file.

  5. To determine the accuracy of the return and related Form 6729-R, the IRR compares the intake/interview sheet to the tax return, supporting documents, and confirms Form 6729-R, QSS Return Review Sheet, was correctly entered into the database.

  6. If a return was originally identified as in-scope by the QSS reviewer, but is later determined to be out-of-scope, the IRR will:

    • Exclude any return that is deemed out of scope in the sample selection.

    • Notify the LIRR that the return was determined to be out of scope and identify the case.

    • E-mail the SPECTRM Helpdesk and request Form 6729-R be removed from the database.

    • E-mail the SPECTRM Helpdesk and request Form 6729, Site Review Sheet, be changed in the database, if necessary, to indicate the site is preparing out of scope returns with a comment indicating why it was deemed out of scope.

  7. The completed Form 6729-I, Inter-rater Return Review Sheet, is added to the case file and any e-mails sent by the IRR, according to the Case File Assembly Job Aid located on the SPEC Quality SharePoint.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.5  (10-01-2011)
Inter-rater Review Feedback

  1. There are three possible outcomes from an Inter-rater Review. Each outcome has specific procedures for providing feedback. The three outcomes are as follows:

    • "No Change"

    • "No change with Adjustments" not affecting the overall accuracy (includes case files with incomplete/conflicting documentation)

    • "Change(s)" which affected the overall accuracy

  2. A "No Change" outcome determination is made when the IRR confirms the QSS reviewer's findings were correct and the case file is complete. A "No Change" e-mail template is available on the Quality SharePoint. The IRR will provide written notification of "No Change" case files to:

    • The QSS reviewer

    • The Quality Program Office manager

  3. A "No Change with Adjustments" , outcome determination is made when the IRR identifies discrepancies in the QSS reviewer's case file that do not change the overall QSS Reviewer's determination on Form 6729–R, QSS Return Review Sheet. If the IRR determines the case file is incomplete and is unable to determine the accuracy of the QSS reviewer's determinations, the IRR will work with the QSS Reviewer to obtain the necessary documentation. If the documentation cannot be obtained, the IRR will obtain concurrence from the QSS reviewer and the Quality Program Office manager. A "No Change with Adjustments" results e-mail will only be issued within the QPO. A "No Change with Adjustments" e-mail is available on the Quality SharePoint. After concurrence has been obtained from the QSS reviewer and the Chief, QPO a feedback e-mail will only be sent to:

    • The QSS reviewer

    • The Chief, QPO

  4. A "Change" outcome affects the overall accuracy of a QSS reviewer’s determination on Form 6729-R due to an invalid tax law determination. The IRR will contact the QSS reviewer and then obtain concurrence from the Chief, QPO. The change(s) will be made in the QD by Inter-Reviewer and include in the comments the changes made. . . This notice should be sent by e-mail with the corrected forms to:

    • Chief, QPO

    • Quality Program Office manager

  5. The Relationship Manager will send the change results e-mail with the corrected forms to their site coordinator and partner.

22.30.1.3.14.4.19.6  (10-01-2011)
Maintaining the Case Files

  1. Once all sampled returns in a case file have been reviewed by the IRR and feedback is issued, headquarters maintains the electronic case files for three years.

22.30.1.3.14.5  (10-01-2011)
Field Site Visits

  1. SPEC territory offices are required to visit a minimum of number of the total sites located within their territory boundaries to promote the IRS relationship with site coordinators and volunteers. These informal field visit play an important role in ensuring partner and site readiness, smooth operation, and ultimately partner satisfaction.

  2. Field Site Visits will be conducted to assess the extent to which the volunteer preparation sites adhere to the Quality Site Requirements.

    • SPEC Field Operations assigns responsibility to territory managers and/or their employees to travel to sites and evaluate the operating procedures.

    • These tax consultants will receive specialized training to learn how to effectively conduct field visits, capture best practices and to also provide constructive feedback on how to improve potential problem areas.

    • Form 6729-F, Field Site Visit, will be used to conduct this review.

22.30.1.3.14.5.1  (10-01-2011)
Purpose of Field Site Visits

  1. Field Site Visits of volunteer sites help us ensure consistency of operations and accuracy of return preparation.

  2. Expected goals:

    • Enhanced field presence to site coordinators, volunteers, and taxpayers

    • Improved partner communications and customer satisfaction

    • Greater site efficiency and compliance with QSR and other regulations

    • Capture data relative to SPEC field site visits (purpose and costs)

    • To gather site demographic data to be used for future program enhancements

  3. Below are tips for:

    • Determining the frequency and priority of visits

    • Conducting visits

    • Performing follow-up visits

22.30.1.3.14.5.2  (10-01-2011)
Frequency of Field Site Visits

  1. Field visits are an important value added benefit which SPEC provides and a critical component of the VITA and TCE operations. To improve quality and encourage consistent performance of sites, the territories should conduct field site visits.

  2. Field visits should be selected by the territory, using the following criteria:

    • New sites during their initial year of operation.

    • Problem sites - complaints or negative feedback received regarding operation and/or volunteers (current or prior year), poor performance based on prior year site review, etc.

    • Established sites with new site coordinators.

    • E-file sites with high reject rates.

    • Sites not reviewed the last several years.

    • VITA and TCE Grant sponsor sites.

    • Territory Manager's discretion

    • Sites participating in the Certified Acceptance Agent (CAA) program.

22.30.1.3.14.5.3  (10-01-2011)
Field Site Visits in General

  1. Field visits can be announced or unannounced. While Site Coordinators are notified during pre-filing season Site Coordinator’s training of the possibility of Site, Return, and Shopping reviews and field visits, the actual selection of a site for a visit may not be announced prior to the visit. If the Territory Manager judges the partner relationship will be in jeopardy by conducting an unannounced visit, the Partner/Site Coordinator may be contacted to alert them to the visit.

    Note:

    The term reviewer and tax consultant are interchangeable throughout this section.

  2. Tax consultants should always take into account the continuing operation of the site during the visit. Most field visits should be conducted between February 1 and April 15. However, visits should be conducted throughout the course of the year, especially when sites are open after April 15.

  3. Some pre-work must be completed before going on the field visit. The tax consultant conducting the visit will need to obtain the following information to verify its accuracy when applicable:

    • Site information should be verified through the SPEC/SERP reports, to confirm address, dates/hours of operations, contact information, and service provided. During the field visits, partners need to verify the reports that the territory office has provided with the actual data (site location and hours of operation) for accuracy.

    • Volunteer information can be validated using Form 13206, Volunteer Assistance Summary Report. The Link and Learn Taxes Certification list should also be secured to take on the visit. This will provide a list of certified volunteers who have taken and passed the test using Link and Learn Taxes.

    • E-file activity and accuracy as reported on the E-file reports page or Individual Master File (IMF) report. The E-file reports are issued daily. The IMF SIDN information will be available on a monthly basis. This monthly report will provide the number of returns filed using the SIDN and the e-file reject rates.

    • Signed assurances and/or agreements for VITA sites: Title VI Form 13325, Statement of Assurance concerning Civil Rights Compliance for IRS SPEC partnerships, or the Form 13324, Statement of Assurance concerning Civil Rights Compliance for IRS SPEC sub-partnerships ; property loan agreement on IRS equipment used; and/or privacy and confidentiality sponsor agreement.

  4. Reviewers will use the Form 6729-F, Field Site Visit, to conduct the visits. Form 6729-F, Field Site Visit, and the related job aid will be used to capture data from the field visit. Form 6729-F should not be completed while at the site. A job aid will be provided to guide the Tax Consultants through the visit. Form 6729-F should be completed after the Tax Consultants has left the site and can be entered directly into the database without first completing a paper Form 6729-F. . The visit may be expanded to include other topics as dictated by the tax consultant, the partner and any special needs of the site.

  5. Use the following publications and documents to assist with the field visit of VITA and TCE operations:

    • Pub. 1084, Volunteer Site Coordinator’s Handbook

    • Pub. 3189, Volunteer e-file Administrator Guide

    • Pub. 4299, Privacy and Confidentiality - A Public Trust

  6. Tax consultants should observe the site’s activities and procedures while conducting the field visit. The site coordinator or their representative may be asked for clarification on site processes.

  7. In all cases, tax consultants should take the opportunity to express gratitude and appreciation to the Site Coordinator and volunteers at the site.

  8. In instances where a field visit reveals a finding requiring a change on how the site operates, the tax consultant should discuss the issue and its resolution with the site coordinator prior to leaving the site, and report it to the relationship manager assigned to the site, if appropriate.

  9. All partners are strongly encouraged to conduct Site and Return reviews at their volunteer sites to help in ensuring consistency in site operations and affirmation of accurate return preparation. The partner organization should establish a schedule to visit the sites in their areas, using a standardized approach including establishing a frequency of review, a method in conducting reviews and performing follow-up reviews.

  10. The territory manager will make the determination on who will conduct field site visits. Generally, field visits are conducted by the Tax Consultants designated as the site’s or partner’s Relationship Manager.

  11. Territory managers are required to perform at least one field performance review on each tax consultant conducting field visits.

  12. ) If the Territory Manager assigns the field visit to a Tax Consultants not assigned to that site or partner, the Tax Consultants will provide immediate verbal feedback to the assigned Relationship Manager. Feedback includes providing positive comments and/or reporting any identified problem areas and providing recommended corrective actions.

  13. The Quality Area Analyst should work with each territory during the planning stages to ensure all procedures are followed. Area offices must implement a process to ensure adequate oversight of all volunteer sites is adhered.

22.30.1.3.14.5.4  (10-01-2011)
Follow-Up Site Reviews

  1. It may be necessary to conduct a follow-up visit of a site to ensure adherence to a requested change in operations. These follow-up visits should be looked upon as a way to assist site coordinators in improving their site operations or possibly to assist them in adopting other best practices to alleviate pitfalls they may have encountered. Follow-up visits should be conducted within 7 days of the initial visit.

  2. The timing of a follow up visit may be strongly influenced by the issues to be resolved. For instance, a site needs to make changes in its electronic filing transmission process but they only transmit once a week. It would not be of benefit to visit the site when they are not transmitting. In the event the visit reveals a site disregarding the QSRs or other requirements, the coordinator should be instructed on how to bring the site into compliance. A follow up visit should be conducted to ensure the site has corrected the concerns. If the site has not corrected the concerns identified, consult with the territory manager to determine what further action should be taken. As a last resort, procedures should be followed for closing a site. These procedures are located in the VITA and TCE Site Requirements and Inappropriate Activities.

    Note:

    Refer to Quality Site Requirements for additional guidelines on conducting follow up visits.

22.30.1.3.14.5.5  (10-01-2011)
Territory Roles for Field Site Visits

  1. During these visits, the territory employee will cover a series of key issues that include (but are not limited to):

    • Relationship building

    • Compliance concerns

    • Equipment assistance

    • Filing season readiness and site set-up

    • TaxWise or e-file

    • Areas of focus

22.30.1.3.14.5.6  (10-01-2011)
Documentation Requirements for Field Site Visits

  1. Every SPEC employee field visit to a site will be captured in the new site visit-reporting database. A training guide and job aid for access to and use of the Field Site Visit Database is available on SPEC Quality shared drive. The database was developed to track the purpose of these visits, the topics covered, and specific site demographic information, such as the number of computers at the site, software used, internet connections, etc., critical to SPEC’s continued success. Field site visit data will be captured throughout the year, from the beginning of site setup until site closure, even if the sites are open beyond the filing season.

  2. Key points regarding site visit documentation:

    • Every site field visit will be input into the database

    • Only 1 site report will be filed per visit (even if multiple employees visited together)

    • Multiple site reports will be filed if a site is visited multiple times during the year

    • Site visit data will be input by close of business on the first day back in the office (or working remotely)

  3. Inform the site coordinator of any findings from the visit prior to leaving the site, and, follow-up by e-mail to the site coordinator (and state coordinator if AARP) within 7 calendar days of the visit.

22.30.1.3.14.5.7  (10-01-2011)
Methodology for Scheduling a Minimum Number of Field Site Visits

  1. Site visits may be coordinated in advance with partners, either announced or unannounced as resources permit or the situation dictates. A minimum number of field site visits will be pre-planned by the territory to ensure a minimum number of territory sites receive a site field visit. In addition, supplemental or ad-hoc field visits may be conducted as needed or deemed appropriate by the territory manager. Field site visits may be conducted by anyone on the territory staff, whether the primary relationship manager or not. There is no grade restriction on who may conduct a visit, although employee experience level should be considered.

  2. Visits should be planned to maximize available travel resources (e.g., several site visits in a particular area in one day). Since these are not formal reviews, it is estimated that required visits will be relatively brief, lasting no more than 30 minutes (unless other SPEC assistance is required). No formal return reviews will be conducted during site visits.

22.30.1.3.14.5.8  (10-01-2008)
Site Review Results

  1. Throughout the filing season, data collected is available for Territory Office analysis. The analysis will help SPEC and its Partner assess the sites’ current and future performance, and validate the consistency of operation as compared to the Quality Site Requirements. This will also allow SPEC and its Partners a way to effectively predict the continued success of the volunteer site. The IRS territory office will analyze the data for trends or patterns and compare how a process or activity is performing before and after a solution has been put in place.

  2. A national SPEC Quality database is provided in which all Site, Return and Shopping Reviews as well as field visits are captured, both SOI and Criteria selected. The data is available at the Territory, Area and National levels for analysis and for sharing with partners. The data is available in reports for specific weeks of activity or cumulatively for the Filing Season. On a national level the data collected will be used to calculate accuracy measures, to inform policy or process changes and to update publications, forms and volunteer training for the upcoming filing season.

22.30.1.3.14.5.9  (10-01-2011)
Issues Arising from Field Site Visits

  1. Findings related to any of the QSR should be resolved using the QSR corrective actions guidance on The Point at http://win.web.irs.gov/spec/SPEC_Quality.htm . Findings not covered in the QSR or corrective actions, such as those identified in the Internal Referral Process, should be referred to headquarters.

22.30.1.3.14.6  (10-01-2011)
Internal/External Referrals

  1. SPEC employees or managers may identify "potential" problems at the site or individual volunteer level while completing QSS or field visits that they determine require additional, independent scrutiny. For this purpose, SPEC developed an internal referral process to provide an opportunity for referral of sites to headquarters to conduct a referral review. Rather than a "random" based visit, these reviews will focus on sites where potential problems may exist and thus will be a very strong deterrent in the overall process. Unlike QSS where progressive action is taken to mediate an identified error, the reviewer will take immediate actions if the allegations included in the referral are accurate.

  2. Similar to the internal referral process, there is an external referral process providing taxpayers, volunteers, site coordinators, etc. an opportunity to report a problem encountered at a VITA and TCE site. To facilitate this process, taxpayers are encouraged to report problems by calling 1-877-330-1205. The reviewer will take progressive actions to mediate an identified error, if the allegations included in the referral are accurate.

22.30.1.3.14.6.1  (10-01-2010)
Internal Referral Process

  1. The purpose of the internal referral process is to provide employees guidance on what to do when an external stakeholder (SPEC partner, VITA and TCE site, or individual volunteer) exhibits behavior which could jeopardize the integrity of the VITA and TCE programs. This process was developed to ensure that taxpayers using the services offered through the VITA and TCE programs could be confident they are receiving accurate return preparation.

  2. Partners, VITA and TCE sites, or individual volunteer behavior must be compliant with the fundamental foundation of the SPEC VITA and TCE programs to ensure their continued growth and instill taxpayer trust. Behavior of volunteers or partners that diminish taxpayer trust may endanger the integrity and effectiveness of the VITA and TCE programs, and therefore must be quickly identified and removed from the program.

22.30.1.3.14.6.1.1  (10-01-2010)
High Risk Attributes

  1. SPEC created the Internal Referral Process to allow our employees to report partners, sites, or volunteers who exhibit high-risk attributes. When these or other similar actions are exhibited in part or in whole, a referral should be made to SPEC headquarters for further review/assessment of the allegations.

    • Disregard of partner, site or volunteer adherence to SPEC’s QSR

    • Lack of organizational oversight to site operations

    • Poor or no communications with the SPEC territory office

    • Carelessness or lack of partner, site, or volunteer to protection of taxpayer data and/or adherence to SPEC’s security requirements

    • Charging of fees for services offered at VITA and TCE sites

    • Actions that indicate partner or volunteer lack of ethical standards

    • Violation of IRS electronic filing rules and/or standards as defined in Publications 3112, IRS e-file Application and Participation and/or 1345, Handbook for Authorized IRS e-file Providers of Individual Income Tax Returns

    • Frequent complaints received from taxpayer’s visiting the site

22.30.1.3.14.6.1.2  (10-01-2010)
SPEC Response to an Internal Referral

  1. When an internal referral is made to headquarters, a member of the headquarter staff will investigate the referral by visiting the partner or the site, which ever is appropriate, in order to confirm the allegation. This action is referred to as a "referral review" . A scenario will be used during the review that will be designed to validate the specific allegation.

22.30.1.3.14.6.1.3  (10-01-2011)
Making an Internal Referral

  1. To make an internal referral, SPEC employees should send an e-mail to wi.voltax@irs.gov. Include enough information in the referral to identify the “high risk” behavior exhibited by the partner, site, and or volunteer that prompted the referral. Include any actions taken by the territory office to deter this behavior. Information such as the site identification number (SIDN), the name and location of the site, and the name(s) of the volunteer and/or partner must be included.

  2. If the referral is being made by a Tax Consultant, the Tax Consultants must notify their Territory Manager prior to making the referral. The Territory Manager will notify their Area Director (AD), and the AD will notify the Chief of O&A who will then notify the director of headquarters operations. This notification process will be used for all internal referrals. This process will be followed prior to any referral being made.

  3. If the referral is being made by a headquarters employee or QSS reviewer, they will notify their manager. Their manager will notify the Chief of QPO, who will notify the chief of (O&A) who will then notify the director of headquarters operations. This notification process will be used for all internal referrals. This process will be followed prior to any referral being made.

22.30.1.3.14.6.1.4  (10-01-2011)
Internal Referral Review Planned Actions

  1. Once a referral is received, the Chief of O&A will review the allegations and will determine if a referral review warrants further investigation. All referral reviews will be conducted by headquarters staff. Referral reviews can be conducted year-round. The referral reviews will be designed to validate the specific allegations.

  2. Once the referral review is completed, the reviewer will provide their findings and mitigation recommendations to the Director of SPEC, the Director of Headquarters Operations, the Chief of O&A, the Chief of QPO, and the appropriate area director.

  3. The actions taken by headquarters will be representative of the referral review findings and will be determined by the parties above. Actions taken can include up to removing the partner/site/volunteer from the VITA and TCE program.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2  (10-01-2010)
External Referral Process

  1. Resembling the internal referral reviews, the scenarios used to evaluate the site will be designed to uncover the specifics of the allegations or reason for the referral. Notification to the territory manager and area director will be made prior to the referral review being conducted.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.1  (10-01-2010)
External Referral Territory Responsibility

  1. Territory offices are responsible for ensuring all VITA and TCE sites are aware of the new products developed for the referral process and ensuring compliance.

  2. Publications 4836 and 4836(SP), VITA and TCE Free Tax Preparation Program, are flyers that provide instructions for reporting problems and includes the above toll-free telephone number. The toll free number is also included on Publication 4807, Form 13614-C Poster. All VITA and TCE sites are required to either distribute the flyer or display the poster in a visible location to facilitate taxpayer awareness of the opportunity to make a referral.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.2  (10-01-2010)
External Referral Review

  1. Once a referral is received, the Chief of O&A will review the allegations and will determine if a referral review is appropriate. All referral reviews will be conducted by headquarters staff. Referral reviews can be conducted year-round. The referral reviews will be designed to validate the allegations.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.3  (10-01-2010)
External Referral Review Planned Actions

  1. Once the referral review is completed, the reviewer will provide their findings and mitigation recommendations to the Director of SPEC, the Director of Headquarters Operations, the Area Director, the Chief of O&A, and the Chief of QPO.

  2. All findings and actions to mitigate the identified risks will be shared with the partner.

  3. The actions taken by headquarters will be representative of the referral review findings and will be determined by the parties above. Actions taken can include up to removing the partner/site/volunteer from the VITA and TCE program.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.4  (10-01-2011)
VolTax Referrals

  1. SPEC has processes in place to help deter opportunities for fraudulent behavior through increased IRS visibility at VITA and TCE sites. Additionally, appropriate measures are taken to ensure that volunteers and site coordinators understand the process of posting proper signs to alert taxpayers of the process to report improper activity. These processes provide reasonable assurance that intentionally unethical or illegal acts are not occurring at sites.

  2. The VolTax referral process provides a toll free phone number and e-mail address where volunteers and taxpayers have the opportunity to contact the IRS should they want to report site operating issues or inappropriate behavior witnessed at sites. Volunteers and taxpayers can call toll free 1-877-330-1205 or send an e-mail to WI.Voltax@irs.gov

  3. Pub 4836, VITA and TCE Free Tax Programs, is required to be displayed at the site or in a visible location to facilitate awareness of the opportunity to make a referral. Form 13614-C Intake/Interview and Quality Review Sheet, and Publication 730, Important Tax Records Envelope, also include the toll free number and e-mail address.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.5  (10-01-2011)
Headquarters Responsibility for VolTax

  1. Referrals received from the toll-free number or the WIVoltax@irs.gov mailbox in SPEC Headquarters will be reviewed by an O&A Analyst. The analyst will determine if fraudulent or inappropriate behavior indicators are present. Inquiries received through VolTax will be addressed within 7 business days to acknowledge the inquiry either by telephone or email where warranted. For inquiries related to tax law or tax accounts, the taxpayer will be referred to irs.gov or 1-800-829-1040.

  2. For inquiries related to rude or unprofessional behavior, or specific to site logistics such as long wait times, site closed, etc., the Territory Manager will be contacted and asked to investigate the inquiry further, and contact the taxpayer, within 7-business days. Territory managers will be asked to respond to the Analysts email indicating the corrective actions taken; the analyst is responsible for ensuring action is taken within 7-business days from the date the Territory Manager is notified. Area Chiefs of Staff must be copied on every inquiry to a Territory Manager. If the Territory Manager fails to timely address the concern, the analyst should notify the Chief, O &A.

  3. For inquiries related to volunteer/site ethics, immediate action is to be taken. The analyst will advise the Chief of Oversight and Analysis of the allegation. If the allegation warrants a visit to the site/partner location, the manner in which the visit will be handled will be appropriate to the allegation. For instance, if the allegations warrant shopping the location, the HQ analyst will make the necessary arrangements within 7-business days.

  4. The Chief Oversight and Analysis will notify the Director of SPEC, Area Director and Territory Manager of the review. Where appropriate, Chief Quality Program Office will consult with Chief Oversight and Analysis and Director SPEC to determine if support should be withdrawn and the relationship with the partner dissolved and/or if the matter should be referred to either the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) or to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). A close-out report of all actions taken to correct or resolve the alleged issue is to be provided to Chief O&A and O&A Analyst within 30 business days unless additional time is requested. The procedures for addressing non-compliance to SPEC Quality Site Requirements will be used as a guide in determining the appropriate corrective actions.

22.30.1.3.14.6.2.6  (10-01-2011)
Area/Territory Responsibility for VolTax

  1. When necessary, the O&A Analyst may refer the inquiry to the appropriate area and territory for a response. It will be the responsibility of the receiving office to make corrections or conduct a Field Site visit if appropriate within 7 business days of receipt and notification. A copy of the actions taken to correct or resolve the issue must be sent to the O&A Analyst and the Chief QPO within 10 business days of completion of the corrective action taken. It will also be the responsibility of the receiving office to provide the inquirer with the appropriate resolution or response if warranted.

22.30.1.3.14.7  (10-01-2011)
Partner Reviews

  1. Effective with the 2012 filing season, SPEC partners are required to conduct site and return reviews at their sponsored sites.

  2. It is recommended that SPEC partners complete a minimum of one site and one return review at all sponsored site within a 5 year-period.


More Internal Revenue Manual