Motor Vehicle Industry Overview Series - June 2004
LMSB Control Number: LMSB:04-0507-043
Affected IRM: X.XX.X
"This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, or cited, or relied upon as such."
A. Purpose of Industry Overview
B. Use of the Intranet and Internet
C. General History of Industry Specialization Program (ISP)
D. History of the Motor Vehicle Technical Advisors
E. Technical Advisor Staffing (LMSB)
F. LMSB Industry Staffing
G. Description of Motor Vehicle Industry
A. Coordinated Issues
B. Significant Issues
C. Specific Industry Related Tax Law
D. Important Revenue Rulings or Revenue Procedures
E. Important Court Cases
F. Technical Advice Memoranda and Private Letter
A. WEB Sites
B. Trade Associations
C. Trade Magazines and Newsletters
D. Internal Revenue Manual Citations
E. Audit Technique Guides
A. Complete Listing of Industry Overviews Available
Introduction
A. Purpose of Industry Overview
This overview is designed to provide industry-related information to all Large and Mid-Size Business (LMSB). This is the first step in the effort of LMSB to develop a greater level of expertise in the industry or industries to which you will be assigned. This overview is one of a series of industry specific overviews. See the Appendix for a complete listing of available overviews.
B. Use of the Intranet and Internet
Each technical advisor has established a web site on the LMSB Intranet. These web sites contain more detailed information on each Technical Advisor area. Topics that have been included in this Industry Guide are sometimes expanded upon and new topics may be added. Each web site also has a “What’s New” section where Technical Advisors can highlight the latest developments such as new court cases, new technical advice memorandums, new revenue rulings, etc. A section called “Forum” has been established where individuals will be able to write questions they have about various issues. Others reading the question may be able to help you with your issue.
C. General History of Industry Specialization Program (ISP)
|
1952 |
The Service was restructured in 1952 into a highly decentralized organization consisting of seven regions and 58 districts. This reorganization was implemented in part to achieve greater sensitivity and responsiveness to pubic needs. District Directors were given wide latitude and authority in administering the Service's policies, procedures and programs. While decentralization of the Service proved to be a progressive action, communication between the regions and districts was made more difficult because of their quasi‑autonomy. Positions taken by the Service on industry issues could differ significantly from one region to another on the same issues. |
|
1971 |
The Service implemented the Industry Wide Examination Program to concurrently examine the major taxpayers in a given industry, coordinate selected issues common to that industry and to resolve those issues uniformly and consistently among all the industry taxpayers. Under the direction of project coordinators (usually large case branch chiefs), the industry wide examinations were largely successful in achieving uniform and consistent treatment of issues. Industry wide examinations were conducted in several industries between 1971 and 1979 and the ability to communicate freely across district and regional lines proved to be invaluable to the success of these examinations. |
|
1977 |
The Industry wide Examination Program had one major drawback. Since they existed for only two or three tax years and were then terminated, the program failed to provide continuity. To correct this situation, a major study group was created in 1977 to review the Service's Coordinated Examination Program. The study recommended that permanent positions be established for several Industry Specialists and a National Industry Coordinator. In addition, the study group identified basic industries to which it recommended specialists be assigned. The duties and responsibilities of the Specialists and the Coordinator were to be much broader than the former Project Coordinators whom they replaced. |
|
1979 |
The recommendations of the study group were implemented greatly expanding the scope and depth of the Industry wide Examination Program. The term, Industry Specialization Program, eventually evolved as a name that could encompass the varied concepts of Industry Specialists, National Industry Coordinator, Coordinated Issues, and the many refinements suggested by the study group. |
|
2000 |
As part of the Internal Revenue Service’s restructuring, the Industry Specialists were assigned to Pre-Filing and Technical Guidance which is part of LMSB, Headquarters. The “Industry Specialists” are now called Technical Advisors. Each of them was placed in one of the five industry areas and is managed by a Technical Advisor manager. |
D. History of the Motor Vehicle Technical Adviser
|
June 1987-December 1988 |
Motor vehicle industry studied and proposed for inclusion in the Industry Specialization Program |
|
August 1989 |
Motor Vehicle Industry Specialization Program (MVISP) formally established and an Industry Specialist (ISP) appointed. |
|
1989-1990 |
MVISP team grows to include an Assistant ISP, a Revenue Agent team member, and several support staff. |
|
May 1991 |
1st MVISP Industry Wide Meeting – Cincinnati, Ohio |
|
Oct. 1994 |
2nd MVISP Industry Wide Meeting – Detroit, MI |
|
June 2000 |
MVISP becomes part of the new Large and Midsize Business Division in the Pre-Filing and Technical Guidance Division |
E. Technical Adviser Staffing (LMSB)
| Name of Specialist | Telephone & Fax | |
| Terri S Harris Technical Advisor |
616-365-4601 |
Terri.S.Harris@irs.gov |
| Michael J. Willemsen Technical Advisor |
313-628-3747 313-628-3770 |
Michael.J.Willemsen@irs.gov |
F. Industry Staffing
The Technical Advisor is assigned to the Pre-Filing and Technical Guidance Division that is a part of LMSB Headquarters. Each industry is assigned to one of the five Industry Functional Divisions. Industry Specialists are known as Technical Advisors in LMSB and are supervised by a Manager, Technical Advisors. Information relative to the management in the Industry Division to which this industry is assigned as well as the Manager of the Technical Advisor(s) of this industry is as follows:
|
Name |
Title |
Location |
| Charlie L. Brantley | Industry Director |
Iselin, NJ |
| Steve Whiteaker | Field Operations Director |
Downers Grove, IL |
| David Horton | Field Operations Director |
Downers Grove, IL |
| Dorothy Livaudais | Manager, Technical Advisors |
Paterson, NJ |
G. Description of Motor Vehicle Industry
The Motor Vehicle Industry encompasses all aspects of a new or used vehicle’s life cycle from manufacturing/importing to distributing, retailing, renting, and leasing. The motor vehicle industry includes all types of foreign and domestic vehicles such as cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles, boats, recreational vehicles, and heavy equipment. Aftermarket products and services also comprise a large part of the industry. The aftermarket consists of original equipment parts manufacturers (OEM), remanufacturers, parts wholesalers, retailers, and vehicle converters. Manufacturers, distributors, and dealers provide a wide array of insurance and financial products including vehicle financing, extended service contracts, and credit life insurance. Companies may also establish related finance companies or insurance companies.
History of Industry
|
1893 |
Charles and Frank Duryea built the first “motorized wagon” with a two-piston, one- cylinder, two-stroke gasoline engine. |
|
1885-1898 |
A Chicago to Milwaukee contest for horseless carriages inspired a generation of entrepreneurs.
|
|
1897 |
Ransom Olds forms Olds Motor Vehicle Co., the first company organized in Michigan solely to build autos. |
|
1898 |
William Metzger opens the first new car dealership in Detroit, MI.
|
|
1902 |
The first franchised auto dealerships, called “agents,” emerged. |
|
1903 |
Manufacturers appointed distributors who then appointed “sub-dealers” to provide the manufacturer with greater coverage in their assigned territories. (The practice of appointing distributors and sub-dealers ceased in the 1950s.) |
|
1903 |
Henry Ford’s newly formed Ford Motor Co. sold 1,708 “Model A” cars (selling price - $850) for a profit of $98,851. |
|
1913 |
Ford Motor Company established the first assembly line manufacturing plant. |
|
1942-1945 |
The U.S. automotive industry ground to a halt as U.S automakers and suppliers produced over $30 billion worth of military hardware in support of the war effort. |
|
1950-1970 |
Independent distributors began the import revolution.
By 1996, the import manufacturer distribution system had evolved to a franchise system similar to the domestic vehicles and only five independent distributors remained. |
|
1973-1979 |
Middle East unrest and the oil embargo spurred manufacturers to design smaller, high-mileage vehicles manufactured from new and lightweight materials. |
|
1978 |
Volkswagen began producing the “Rabbit” in Westmoreland County Pennsylvania, the first high volume foreign manufacturing operation in the U.S. |
|
1982 |
Honda built the first Japanese assembly plant in the U.S. |
|
1990 |
General Motors unveils the EVI – the first electric vehicle. |
|
1996 |
A wave of mergers overtakes the automotive supplier industry.
|
|
1996 |
The “year of the used car”
|
|
1996-present |
Some independent new car dealerships unite into “mega” dealerships offering “one stop” shopping and “no-haggle” pricing.
Republic Enterprises attempts to establish a new and used car dealership “brand” with AutoNation superstores.
|
|
1997-present |
Internet becomes the “buzz word” of the auto industry.
Parts makers join the on-line revolution allowing manufacturers, dealers, and individuals to purchase parts through the Internet. |
|
1998 |
Chrysler Corporation and German auto company Daimler-Benz merge.
|
|
1999 |
Auto manufacturers roll out web-based supply network that will allow “business to business” purchases over the Internet. |
|
2003 |
Ford celebrates it’s 100th Year anniversary |
|
2003 |
General Motors discontinues the Oldsmobile line |
|
2003 |
China equal US in production plant investment dollars |
Trends
Globalization is key to the continued success of the industry.
- Manufacturers will continue to partner with suppliers and increasingly require suppliers to finance and engineer new products.
- Manufacturers will focus on innovation and increase emphasis on swift transitions from idea to completion.
- Computer assisted design facilitates this process.
- The growing use of the Internet will speed up the production cycle and bring new products to market faster.
- Manufacturers and distributors will provide an Internet based system to allow customers to custom order vehicles directly from the manufacturer.
- Manufacturers are experimenting selling cars directly to customers using the internet and ebay, the internet auction company.
-
Manufacturers are expanding operations and sales in China.
- Mergers, consolidations, global competition, and severe price pressures from customers will continue to drive the industry.
- Record production and declining profitability is expected as manufacturers continue to push suppliers for price reductions.
- Restructuring of the supplier base is expected to continue as companies seek optimum size to meet customers increasing demands.
- Original equipment manufacturers (OEM) will continue to shift design and warranty responsibilities to suppliers.
- “Business to Business” (BtoB) e-commerce will change the way components and materials are bought and sold.
- Manufacturers and distributors will continue to redefine, reduce, and relocate their dealership body.
- Manufacturers and distributors will continue to test direct sales to consumers with delivery at a local dealership.
- Superstores and publicly traded dealership groups will continue to be a factor in the industry.
- Buyers will increasingly use the Internet to gather information prior to contacting a dealership.
- Internet vehicle purchases will become a substitute to the traditional dealership purchase for some buyers.
- The Internet will continue to influence the way parts are bought and sold at the dealership level.
Industry Terms
|
Advertising Fee |
An amount added to the invoice price of a vehicle by the manufacturer to be used in general or specific advertising by the manufacturer and/or dealer.
|
|
Advertising Association |
An affiliation of dealerships representing the same manufacturer in the same geographical area (city, county, state, etc.) that places cooperative advertising.
|
|
Agent |
An agent is one who represents and acts for another, whose function is to bring about, accept performance of, or terminate contractual obligations between a principal and third persons. As it relates to Extended Service Contracts, Warranties, etc, an agent is one who represents and acts for another, whose function is to bring about, accept performance of, or terminate contractual obligations between a principal and third persons. |
|
Auction |
A sale of used vehicles operated by independent auction houses or vehicle manufacturers. |
|
Aftermarket |
Manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers that provide replacement parts and customization for vehicles. |
|
Back end |
The fixed operations of an automobile dealership; i.e. body shop, service department and parts department. |
|
Back end distribution |
An amount paid by a finance company to a dealership upon transfer of the dealership customers’ financing notes, when certain requirements have been met. |
|
Base Model Code Number |
Identifies an item of inventory which is determined by using the entire manufacturer's base model code number that represents the most detailed description of the base vehicle's characteristics under the Alternative LIFO. |
|
Base Price |
The cost of a vehicle without options, but including standard equipment, factory warranty, and freight. |
|
Base Vehicle Cost |
The cost of a vehicle for Alternative LIFO Method computations that is not adjusted for any options, accessories or other costs. The pool index computed from only the base vehicle cost of vehicles is applied to the total vehicle cost, including options, accessories and other costs of all vehicles in the pool at the end of the taxable year. |
|
Bird Dog Fee |
A finder’s fee paid to someone who refers a customer to a dealership. |
|
Body-On-Frame Construction |
A method of car design in which the body, engine, driveline, and suspension are bolted to a weight-bearing frame. |
|
Buy Rate |
The rate set by a financing institution, for which it will purchase dealership customer loans. |
|
Capitalized Cost |
The total value for a vehicle upon which a lease is based. |
|
CCR (Capital Cost Reduction) |
The amount paid in cash and/or trade-in at the inception of a lease. Similar to a down payment. |
|
Car Jacket |
A separate folder for each new vehicle sold which contains documentation pertaining to this particular transaction. |
|
Carryover |
Changes to a vehicle model for a new model year limited to the following:
|
|
Chassis |
Originally the frame of the car which provided the strength of the vehicle to which the body, engine, driveline components and suspension were attached. |
|
Closed End Lease |
A lease for which the amount representing the residual value of the vehicle at the end of the lease is mutually agreed upon within the lease document.
|
|
Contracts in Transit |
Notes receivable for vehicle sales or leases that have been approved by a financing institution but for which a dealership has not yet received the proceeds. |
|
Core |
A non-functioning part usually with replaceable components removed.
|
|
Core Charge |
An amount that the purchaser of a remanufactured part must pay to the selling company if the purchaser does not provide a non-functioning part (core).
|
|
Cost Segregation |
The reallocation of building costs from 39 year to 5, 7, or 15 year MACRS property |
|
Dealership |
The authorized (franchised) sales and service representative of a motor vehicle manufacturer/importer. |
|
Deal Jacket, Folder, or File |
A file set up for each vehicle sale that contains all of the paperwork relating to the sale. |
|
Demonstrator/(Demos) |
A vehicle held for sale by a dealership but made available to customers for test-drives. |
|
Distributor |
A company in the that distributes, regionally or nationally, vehicles built by a foreign manufacturer. |
|
Domestic vehicle |
A vehicle produced in the United States, Canada, or Mexico |
|
Enrollment Fee |
Generally, dealers must pay an enrollment fee to enter into an agreement to transfer notes to a finance company. |
|
ESC (Extended Service Contract a.k.a. Vehicle Service Contract) |
An aftermarket product that for an additional price, provides coverage for the repair or replacement of covered components at minimal or no cost. |
|
Floor Pan |
The metal structure on the bottom of the car. |
|
Floor plan line of credit /Floor Plan |
An arrangement through which a dealership borrows money from a financing institution (frequently a subsidiary of the manufacturer) to finance its vehicle inventory. |
|
Floor Plan Assistance or Allowance |
An amount paid by the manufacturer to the dealership for the interest expense charged under the floor plan agreement for the time that the vehicle was in transit from the factory to the dealership. |
|
Flooring Statement |
Statement issued by lending institutions reflecting amount of credit extended to a particular dealership for vehicle purchases. |
|
Franchise |
A contract authorizing a person or persons to represent a vehicle manufacturer/importer for sales and service for a specific period. |
|
Freshen |
Changes to a vehicle model for a new model year limited to the following:
|
|
Front End |
New and used vehicle sales departments. |
|
Holdback |
An amount (generally 2-3 percent of adjusted MSRP) included in the vehicle invoice amount. |
|
Import |
A vehicle produced outside of North America and sold in North America |
|
Invoice Price |
The manufacturer’s initial charge. |
|
Light Vehicle |
A car or truck with a gross vehicle weight of 14,000 pounds or less. |
|
MSRP Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price |
The recommended selling price for a vehicle and each of its optional accessories. |
|
Manufacturer’s Statement of Origin (MSO) |
A manufacturer’s document that assigns ownership of a new vehicle to the dealership. |
|
Make |
Brand name of a car or truck; e.g., Chevrolet, Dodge, Mazda. |
|
Maquiladora |
An arrangement to reduce manufacturing costs by taking advantage of the lower costs of labor, plant, and equipment in Mexico |
|
Model |
Body style |
|
Money Factor |
A percentage representing the cost of the money required to lease a vehicle, similar to the interest rate paid on a loan. |
|
NADA |
The National Automobile Dealers Association. Is an organization whose purpose is to serve as a network catalyst of information which is disseminated to member dealers and as an advocate in Washington for dealership interests. |
|
Nameplate |
Name given a vehicle by its manufacturer; e.g. Civic, Mustang, Intrepid. (Line is a synonym for a nameplate.) |
|
New Item Category |
A new item category as defined for Alternative LIFO, is an item category not considered in existence in the prior taxable year, is one of the following (i) any new or reassigned manufacturer's model code, as described in IRM section 4.02(3), that is caused by a change in an existing vehicle or (ii) a manufacturers model code, as described in IRM section 4.02(3), created or reassigned because the classified vehicle did not previously exist. Additionally, if there is no change in a manufacturer's model code, but there has been a change to the platform that results in a change in track width or wheel base, whether or not the same model name was previously used by the manufacturer's, a new item category is created. New items are found in all LIFO computations, not just in Alternative LIFO. |
|
Official Used Car Guide |
A guide book or electronic presentation of the wholesale, retail, and loan value of used cars |
|
Open End Lease |
A lease for which the lessee must pay any difference between the residual value of the leased vehicle and the fair market value, if the fair market value is lower, at the end of the lease. |
|
Out of Trust |
The result of a dealership selling a vehicle but not paying off the related floor plan liability within the time specified in the floor plan agreement. |
|
PEP Cars |
Product Evaluation Program – vehicles are provided by manufacturers and/or distributors to employees who provide comments regarding the operations of the vehicles. |
|
Platform |
The main structural element or backbone of a vehicle to which the suspension, power train, and body are mounted. |
|
Prime |
A designation generally used to describe high quality finance contracts (A and B contracts). |
|
Preparation Charges |
Charges imposed by a dealer for preparing a newly purchased car for delivery to the buyer. |
|
Redesign |
Changes to a vehicle model for a new model year limited to the following: |
|
Report of Sales Book |
A record kept by auto dealerships of all sales made and reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles, as required by state law. For example, in California , all sales must be reported within 5 days of sale in order for the vehicles to be registered. |
|
Residual Value |
The amount agreed upon to represent the value of the leased vehicle at the termination of the lease period. |
|
Reskin |
Changes to a vehicle model for a new model year limited to the following: |
|
Restyle |
Changes to a vehicle model for a new model year limited to the following: |
|
Shuttling Service |
To transport vehicles to and/or from the dealership; hence a car shuttler is a person who performs those services. |
|
Spiffs |
Amounts paid in cash or merchandise by a dealership to employees to stimulate and/or reward employees for meeting sales volumes or other criteria. |
|
Sub Prime/Non Prime |
Generally describes finance contracts for less creditworthy customers. (C& D Credit) |
|
Tier 1, 2, & 3 Suppliers |
The hierarchy of suppliers in the automotive industry. |
|
Trade-in Value |
The amount that the dealership will credit the customer for a vehicle as a partial or full payment on another vehicle. |
|
Transplant |
A foreign manufacturer’s U.S. manufacturing and/or assembly facility. |
|
Unibody Construction |
A manufacturing process where sheet metal body parts are combined with stress-bearing elements to form the body and chassis as a single piece, as opposed to attaching body parts to a frame. |
|
Warranty Repairs |
Repairs made under a warranty contract that the manufacturer pays the dealership to make. |
Accounting Principles
|
Accounting Manuals |
To facilitate the detailed and specific accounting practices and procedures, manufacturers and distributors provide step by step accounting manuals to dealers. |
|
Last in First Out (LIFO) Inventory Method |
A cost flow concept that assumes for purposes of determining the value of ending inventory, the last inventory items purchased or produced are the first to be sold. |
|
Alternative LIFO for Auto Dealerships |
A simplified method of computing LIFO available to dealers in automobiles and light trucks. |
|
LIFO Conformity |
Taxpayers that elect LIFO many use no method other than LIFO for purposes of statements to shareholders and creditors. |
|
Service Warranty Income Method (SWIM) |
Revenue Procedure 97-38 (Previously Rev. Proc. 92-98) provides a method of accounting by which the obligor on an extended service contract can defer the reporting of a portion of the sales proceeds. |
|
Percentage of Completion |
Technical Advice Memorandum 199925002 (March 8, 1999) ruled that molds used in automobile parts production are unique items for purposes of IRC §460(f). |
|
Alternative LIFO for Used Vehicle Dealers |
Revenue Procedure 2001-23 |
Information Systems
| Dealership |
|
|
Manufacturers/Distributors/ Suppliers |
|
Industry Operating Procedures
|
Significant Law and Important Issues
IRM section 4.51.2.4 provides that Coordinated Issues are binding on all IRS examiners and any deviation from the position stated in the Coordinated Issue papers must be discussed with the Technical Advisor.
|
Issue: |
Issue Description: |
|
Dollar Value LIFO |
For purposes of an inventory of motor vehicles, an item of LIFO inventory is defined by reference to:
|
|
Remanufacturers must value their inventory of cores for tax purposes at cost unless they substantiate a lower inventory valuation in accordance with the provisions of the regulations.
|
|
|
Any excess parts that have been transferred to a warehousing company are includible in inventory when the taxpayer retains dominion and control over the parts.
|
|
|
Whether amounts paid to motor vehicle service technicians, as tool reimbursements meet the accountable plan requirements of IRC §62.
|
The Motor Vehicle Technical Adviser is currently developing the following issues. Although in some cases clear guidance exists; the issue remains an area of non-compliance within the industry. Other issues require further development of the facts and circumstances to determine the proper treatment of the item. The facts and circumstances of each issue must be evaluated and the applicable law must be applied as appropriate to the facts.
|
Issue |
Brief Summary of Issue: |
|
Issue: Whether computer systems used by automobile dealerships to generate financial and accounting data satisfy the record retention and accessibility requirements of Revenue Procedure 98-25.
|
|
|
Issue: Whether the capital cost reduction payment (CCR) or the first monthly lease payment made by a lessee is income to the purchasing company (frequently the finance subsidiary of a motor vehicle manufacturer or distributor), or a reduction in the basis of the leased vehicle on the books of the purchaser.
|
|
|
Issue: Whether dealer participation paid by an automotive finance company to a dealer on the acquisition of a retail installment sales contract (RISC) or lease should be capitalized and amortized.
|
|
|
Issue: Whether demonstrator vehicles provided to dealership employees qualify as excludible working condition fringe benefits.
|
|
|
Issue: What is the proper method of reporting proceeds from the sale of extended service contracts, payments for the purchase of insurance policies, and amounts remitted to an administrator, escrow account, or producer owned reinsurance company (PORC)?
|
|
|
Issue 1: What is the proper tax treatment of interest rate support payments (subvention payments) made by an automobile manufacturer to its wholly owned finance subsidiary in the following circumstances?:
Issue 2: Is the subvention transaction a method of accounting or a method of reporting? Issue 1 Status: Following the Tax Court’s decision in General Motors v. Comm., 112 TC 270 (1999), the 1995 consolidated return intercompany transaction regulations, and TAM 200302002, subvention payments made by a manufacturer or distributor to it’s wholly-owned finance subsidiary are deductible in the year paid. Further, subvention payments received by the finance subsidiary reduce the basis of the RISC, or, in the case of a lease, reduce the basis of the leased vehicle. The finance subsidiary includes the subvention payment in taxable income over time as the retail customer makes its payments. Still at issue is whether the manufacturer or distributor can currently deduct its accrued subvention liability under Section 461 before it actually makes the subvention payment to the finance subsidiary. Issue 2 Status: The issue here is whether the subvention payment transaction is a method of accounting, or a method of reporting , that does not require the Commissioner’s consent to change. This is a factual determination. Following the GM Tax Court decision, many industry taxpayers filed claims to either reverse the deferral of the manufacturer’s subvention deduction or to reverse the finance subsidiary’s current inclusion of the subvention payment in its taxable income. Those taxpayers that made the reversals on their tax returns as “consolidated return adjustments” similar to the adjustments made by GM have generally had their claims allowed. The Tax Court determined that these adjustments are changes in methods of reporting consolidated taxable income and consent to change was not required. But those taxpayers who made their reversals as part of their separate method of accounting, where the facts differ from GM, have had their claims denied. See for example, TAM 200302002. This issue generally applies to claims filed for tax years prior to 1996. After 1995, the revised consolidated return regulations define this as an intercompany transaction, and state that all intercompany transactions are considered methods of accounting. Advice: 1) What if your taxpayer claims a deduction under section 461 when it accrues the subvention liability but defers payment over time, or 2) What if you receive a claim for subvention that spans both pre-1996 and post-1995 tax periods? You should contact the Motor Vehicle Technical Advisor for advice. Both of these issues are currently being considered by Appeals. |
|
|
Issue: Whether the transfers of lease vehicles followed by the acquisition of replacement vehicles are deferred exchanges, each qualifying for non-recognition of gain or loss under section 1031.
Advice: The above rulings were obtained by banks. The like kind exchange issue is currently being examined on several industry cases. Please contact the Motor Vehicle Technical Advisor if you have this issue on your examination. |
|
|
Issue: What is the proper valuation method to use in determining the fair market value of motor vehicle finance securities for purposes of Section 475, mark to market (MTM)? Background: A number of industry taxpayers are engaged in the business of acquiring retail installment sales contracts (“RISCs”) from independent dealerships covering the sales of motor vehicles to the dealership’s customers. Generally, motor vehicle manufacturers and distributors establish a captive finance subsidiary whose principal purpose is to acquire the RISCs from the independent dealers. These taxpayers are considered (or can elect to be considered) dealers in securities, and consequently, the RISCs are debt instruments under section 475(c)(2)(C) and are subject to the mark-to-market provisions. Status: On April 30, 2003, an Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making was published that describes and explains a possible safe harbor that would satisfy the MTM valuation requirement for certain securities and commodities (REG -100420-03). The ANPRM does not change the Service’s position with respect to this issue as it is currently illustrated in Bank One Corp. v. Commissioner, (120 T.C. No. 11).Accordingly, John Petrella, Director, Heavy Manufacturing and Transportation, has directed that current audits involving the section 475 MTM valuation issue should proceed in the same manner as before the ANPRM was issued., and no published guidance will be issued by the Service until the proposed regulations are finalized. Advice: What does this mean to you if you have the issue? You should contact either the Section 475 Technical Advisor, Suzanne Boule, or the Motor Vehicle Technical Advisor. They are both currently working closely with the Financial Products Specialists that are developing MTM valuation methodologies on a number of industry examinations. Because these methodologies involve complex economic and finance principles, they are beyond the scope of this guide. Further, the MTM issue is affected by both the subvention issue and the securitization issue, so it is important to coordinate the development of all three issues. |
|
|
Issue: How can a taxpayer to value parts inventory? A taxpayer can use replacement cost to value parts inventory.
|
|
| Producer Owned Reinsurance Companies (PORC) |
Issue: Do transactions with a Producer Owned Reinsurance Company (PORC) qualify as arms length transactions or is the PORC as sham corporation?
|
|
|
Whether the manufacturer or supplier (or both) is entitled to the research credit when the manufacturer requires the supplier to develop all or part of a component, subsystem, or production process.
Potential issues:
Scope of the Issue: Potentially affects all motor vehicle manufacturers and suppliers. |
|
Whether transfers of vehicle finance contracts from the selling dealership to a related finance company are arms length transactions or whether the RFC is a sham corporation.
Scope of the Issue: Potentially affects all used car dealerships and allows dealerships to reduce income or defer the reporting of income in a manner not contemplated by the tax statute and rules.
|
|
|
Whether the use of replacement cost in valuing a LIFO inventory complies with the regulatory requirements to value LIFO inventory at cost.
|
|
|
Whether the securitization of automotive retail installment sales contracts (RISCs) should be treated as a sale or a secured financing.
Status: Currently the only published guidance with respect to automotive RISC securitizations is LTR 9839001 (see below under Section F). Advice: What does this mean to you if you have the issue? You should contact either Technical Advisor Tim Taggart or the Motor Vehicle Technical Advisor. |
|
|
Whether the direct and indirect costs incurred to remove a competitor’s stock and replace the merchandise with the stocklifting company’s products are currently deductible or whether the costs must be capitalized.
Advice: The final 263(a) regulations on the capitalization of intangibles contains an example addressing the treatment of stocklifting costs (2003 TNT 246-4; 1.263(a)-4(l) Example 8). Generally, if the new customer is under no obligation to continue stocking the manufacturer’s or distributor’s parts, then capitalization is not required for the stocklifting costs. The final regulations were published at the end of 2003. |
|
|
What is the proper tax treatment of the transfer of sub-prime and/or non-prime vehicle finance notes from the selling dealership to an unrelated finance company?
|
|
| Used Car Write-down |
Whether a vehicle dealership that elected the Lower of Cost or Marketing method of accounting can reduce the value of its used car inventory at year-end.
|
|
|
What is the proper method of computing LIFO for used vehicles? Based on the fact and circumstances of each case and applying the reasoning found in the related rulings, generally:
|
C. Important Revenue Rulings or Revenue Procedures
|
Effective Date |
Title and Number |
Summary and Impact of Ruling and Procedure |
| Release Date: February 10, 2003 | Revenue Procedure 2003-20 |
Core Alternative Valuation (CAV)
|
| Release Date: April 1, 2002 | Revenue Procedure 2002-17 |
Parts Inventory
|
| Release Date: May 28, 2002 | Revenue Procedure 2002-36 |
CCR Payments
|
|
Release Date: June 17, 2002
|
Revenue Procedure 2002-42 |
Clean-Fuel vehicle property
|
| Release Date: November 25, 2002 | Revenue Ruling 2002-67 |
Car Donations
|
| Effective for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2000 | Revenue Procedure 2001-23 |
Alternative LIFO for Used Vehicle Dealers
Indexes are then applied to the value of the ending inventory at current year cost to determine whether an increment or decrement has occurred. |
|
September 28, 1992 Amended and superceded August 18, 1997 |
Revenue Procedure 97-36 (Previously Revenue Procedure 92-79) |
Alternative LIFO for automobile dealers.
|
| Release Date: September 25, 1997 |
Revenue Ruling 97-42 |
LIFO Conformity
|
| Release Date: September 25, 1997 | Revenue Procedure 97-44 |
LIFO Conformity-settlement provisions
|
|
Release Date: September 8, 1998
|
Revenue Procedure 98-46 |
LIFO Conformity-settlement provision extension
|
|
Effective Date: June 12, 1992
|
Revenue Procedure 92-98 |
Elective procedure to report income from the sale of extended service contracts-Service Warranty Income Method (SWIM)
|
|
Release Date: July, 1972 |
Revenue Ruling 72-326 |
Proper accounting for payment of “holdback” amounts received by a dealership from the manufacturer
|
| 1984 | Revenue Ruling 84-41 |
Inventory Values and Rebates
|
|
Release Date: January, 1970 |
Revenue Ruling 70-337 |
Proper treatment of incentive payments received by dealership employees from manufacturer. (Note: The payments considered by this issue are not the incentives or rebates paid by the manufacturer to the dealership based on the dealership’s performance.)
§ Amounts are compensation for services performed for the manufacturer.
|
|
Date Opinion Issued |
Court Case |
Ruling |
|
December 2, 2002 |
Best Auto Sales; T.C. Memo 2002-297 |
Used car write downs Ruling
|
|
February 11, 1999 |
BMW of North America, Inc.; 83 AFTR2d Par. 99-413 |
U.S. District Court granted partial summary judgment to the Government. |
|
June 22, 1959 |
Commissioner vs. Hansen; 360 U.S. 446 |
Amounts credited to an automobile dealership in a reserve account on the books of the finance company must be reported as income during the tax year in which the amounts are credited to the reserve accounts. |
|
July 20, 1998 |
Consolidated Manufacturing, Inc.; 111 T.C. No. 1 |
LIFO must be elected for an entire “good” and not a portion of the goods such as labor and overhead. |
|
May 26, 2000 |
Esobar de Paz. V. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2000-176 |
All amounts paid to employees for transporting cargo in employee-owned trucks were wages. The employees were not engaged in two separate activities of leasing trucks to their employer and driving the trucks. |
|
August 12, 1996 |
E.W. Richardson; T.C. Memo 1996-368 T.C. Memo 2000-176 |
An auto dealership made an unauthorized change in method of accounting when it changed its definition of a LIFO inventory item from “vehicle body size” to “model line.”
|
|
May 11, 1981 |
Fox Chevrolet, Inc.; 76 T.C. 708 |
Two separate pools are required for purposes for new car LIFO. |
|
July 18, 1994 |
Hinshaws, Inc. T.C. Memo 1994-327 |
Auto dealerships must report collections for vehicle service contracts as gross income in the year received. |
|
July 7, 1997 |
Howard Pontiac GMC, Inc.; T.C. Memo 1997-313 |
The Tax Court “split the baby in half” ruling that neither the taxpayer nor the Government properly valued a covenant not to compete. |
|
January 24, 2000 |
Leb’s Enterprises, Inc.; 85 AFTR2d Par, 2000-450 |
U.S. District Court granted summary judgment to the Government. |
|
August 18, 1995 |
Malone and Hyde, Inc; 76 AFTR2d Par 95-5250 |
Payments by a parent corporation to a subsidiary for “insurance” are not deductible. |
|
March 2, 1999 |
Mountain State Ford Truck Sales, Inc.; 112 T.C. No. 7 |
For LIFO inventory purposes, taxpayers must use actual cost and not replacement cost. |
|
June 16, 1997; July 21, 1999 |
Rameau A Johnson, etal. 108 T.C. No.22; Affirmed 84AFTR2d; 99-5073 |
Auto dealerships must report income from sale of vehicle service contracts in the year sold. |
|
May 11, 1981 |
Richardson Investments, Inc.; 76 T.C. 736 |
An automobile dealership could not use one pool consisting of new cars and new trucks, for LIFO purposes. |
|
February 18, 1963 |
Schlude vs. Commissioner; 372 U.S. 128 |
Income is taxable to an accrual basis taxpayer when all events have occurred fixing the right to receive it. |
|
February 8, 2000 |
Toyota Town, Inc.; T.C. Memo 2000-40 |
Automobile dealerships must amortize insurance premiums ratably over the term of the vehicle service contract. |
|
June 2, 2000 |
Trans-Box Systems, Inc. v. United States, 84 A.F.T.R. 2d(RIA) 6479 (N.D. Cal. 1998) affd. 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12595 (9th Cir. June 2, 2000) |
Amounts paid to employee drivers as reimbursements for mileage expenses were not paid pursuant to accountable plan. Rejected plaintiff’s assertion that a substantial compliance rule applies to accountable plans. |
|
June 7, 1979 |
Wendell Ford Sales, Inc.; 72 T.C. 447 |
The addition of a catalytic converter and a solid state ignition system did not make the 1975 Ford vehicle a different “item” for LIFO purposes than the 1974 Ford vehicle. |
|
August 14, 1997 |
William L McCurley; T.C. Memo 1997-371 |
Distributions from a “shared” PORC are dividends to the individual. |
|
July 26, 1993 Amended October 29, 1993 |
William Wright et al; T.C. Memo 1993-325 76 AFTR2d Par. 95-5805 |
Transactions between the dealership and the Producer Owned Reinsurance Company (PORC) were characterized as sham transactions. |
E. Technical Advice Memoranda and Private Letter Rulings
PLRs AND TAMs ARE ADDRESSED ONLY TO THE TAXPAYERS WHO REQUESTED THEM. FSAs ARE NOT BINDING ON EXAMINATION OR APPEALS, NOR ARE THEY FINAL DETERMINATIONS. FURTHERMORE, SECTION 6110(k)(3) PROVIDES THAT PLRs, TAMs AND FSAs MAY NOT BE USED OR CITED AS PRECEDENT.
|
Date |
Number |
Description |
| September 1989 | LTR 8906001 |
LIFO
|
| April 1993 | LTR 9332003 |
LIFO
|
| August 1994 | LTR 9433004 |
Replacement Cost LIFO
|
| June 1994 | LTR 9435039 |
Luxury Tax – Sport Utilities
|
| August 1994 | LTR 9448004 |
Equipment Leasing - Inventory
|
| January 1995 | LTR 9522002 |
Demonstrator Vehicles
|
| September 1995 |
LTR 9535005 LTR 9535006 LTR 9535007 |
Luxury Tax
|
| January 1997 | LTR 9704002 |
Related Finance Companies
|
| July 1997 | LTR 9729002 |
Producer Owned Reinsurance Company
|
| May 1997 | LTR 9746011 |
LIFO Recapture
|
| January 1998 | LTR 9801002 |
Demonstrator Vehicles
|
| March 1998 | LTR 9811004 |
Equipment Leasing - Depreciation
|
| July 1998 | LTR 9830001 |
Residual Value Insurance for Leases
|
| September 1998 | LTR 9839001 |
Transfers of Automobile Loans
|
|
October 1998 March 1999 March 1999 |
LTR 9840001 LTR 199909003 LTR 199909002 |
Sub-Prime/Non-Prime Financing
|
| September 1998 | LTR 9853003 |
Used Car LIFO
|
| September 1998 | LTR 9893001 |
Securitizations
|
| March 1999 | LTR 199911044 |
LIFO Pooling for Auto Dealerships
|
| March 1999 | LTR 199925002 |
Accounting for Manufacturing Molds
|
| May 2000 | ILM 200048001 |
Capital Cost Reduction Payments (CCR)
|
| July 2002 |
LTR 200242009 LTR 200241013 LTR 200240049 |
Like Kind Exchanges
|
|
April 26, 2002 |
FSA 200217025 |
Dealer Participation
|
|
September 3, 2002
|
TAM 200302002 |
Subvention
|
Industry Resources
|
A nation wide association of CPA firms that specializes in providing services to auto dealerships. |
|
|
A consortium of CPAs serving the auto dealership community. |
|
|
|
Contains news, informational databases, and reviews on activity in the original equipment manufacturing industry. |
|
|
News, buying guides, layman’s manual, industry events |
|
Coverage of significant events and activities in the automotive industry including manufacturing and dealerships. |
|
|
Provides consumer information, convention information and registration, technical information, and links to other sites. |
|
|
Sponsor of the University of the Aftermarket |
|
|
Official magazine of the National Automobile Dealers Association. |
|
|
A volunteer organization that addresses industry issues in supply, manufacturing, engineering, quality, and finance. |
|
|
Published by Crain Communications, Automotive News is a respected source of new affecting the entire automotive industry. |
|
|
A publication of the Detroit Free Press, the site contains daily industry coverage, reviews, and links to other sites. |
|
|
Provides news, events, classified ads, and links to other sites. |
|
|
An automotive encyclopedia. |
|
|
In-depth analysis, concept vehicle photos, maintenance questions answered, links to other sites. |
|
|
New and used car and truck prices. |
|
|
Specializes exclusively in LIFO accounting. |
|
|
Provides news and research material related to automobile manufacturers. |
|
|
Published by the National Auto Dealers Association, the NADA guide is a leading source of new and used car pricing information. |
|
|
NADA represents over 19,600 franchised new car and new truck dealerships holding almost 40,000 domestic and import franchises. |
|
|
NIADA represents independent automobile dealerships. |
|
|
Part of the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. |
|
|
Provides information on the annual convention, technical information, training information, and links to other sites. |
|
|
Provides technical information for automotive engineers, information on the annual convention, and continuing professional education. |
|
|
Consultant to auto dealer CPAs. |
|
Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM) |
1001 19th Street North; Suite 1200 |
Trade association that represents United States subsidiaries of international automobile companies doing business in the United States. |
|
Automotive Engine Rebuilders Association (AERA) |
330 Lexington Drive; Buffalo Grove IL 60089-6998 |
A non-for-profit trade association serving the engine rebuilder/remanufacturing industry, machine shops, equipment parts and services suppliers. |
|
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) |
26200 Lasher Road, Suite 200; Southfield, MI 48034 |
A volunteer organization that addresses industry issues in supply, manufacturing, engineering, quality, and finance. |
|
Automotive Parts Rebuilders Association (APRA) |
4401 Fair Lakes Court, Suite 210; Fairfax, Virginia 22033-3848 |
Represents rebuilders of small parts such as brakes |
|
Automotive Parts & Service Alliance (APSA) |
4600 East-West Highway, Suite #300; Bethesda, MD 20814 |
A combined government affairs advocacy group made up of the Automotive Parts & Accessories Association (APAA), the Automotive Service Industry Association (ASIA) and the Automotive Warehouse Distributors Association (AWDA), |
|
Automotive Warehouse Distributors Association |
9140 Ward Parkway, Suite 200; Kansa City Mo. 64114 |
A membership organization of warehouse distributors and their respective suppliers of parts, accessories tools and other supplies for the automotive aftermarket. |
|
Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Assoc |
10 Laboratory Drive; P O Box 13966; Research Triangle Park; NC 27709 |
MEMA is the only national vehicle products association whose members are exclusively manufacturers. |
|
National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) |
8400 Westpark Drive; McLean Virginia 22102 |
Represents franchised new car and truck dealerships. |
|
Production Engine Remanufacturers Assoc |
415 W Golf Rd; Suite 43; Arlington Heights IL 60005 |
The organization’s primary purpose is to give its members the information they need to produce remanufactured engines equal or superior to original engines in quality and performance |
|
Society of Automotive Engineers; SAE World Headquarters |
400 Commonwealth Drive; Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 USA |
An organization that provides technical information and expertise used in designing, building, maintaining, and operating self-propelled vehicles for use on land or sea, in air or space. |
Trade Magazines and Newsletters
|
Auto World |
Monthly - Subscription – Free |
Wards Communication. |
|
Automotive News |
Weekly - Subscription - $114 |
Published by Crain Communications. |
|
Car Dealer Insider |
Monthly - Subscriptions - $319 per year |
Newsletter. |
|
Dealer Business |
Monthly - Subscription - Free |
Published by Intertec Publishing Company -Wards Communications. |
|
Automotive Executive |
Monthly - Subscription - $24 per year |
Published by the National Automobile Dealers Association. |
Internal Revenue Manual Citations
|
Part IV Subsection 42(14) |
Income Tax Examinations |
Industry specialization has been established to ensure uniform and consistent treatment of issues nationwide and to provide better identification and development of issues. |
|
Part IV Subsection 42(14)2 |
Income Tax Examination |
Provides an overall description of the industry specialization program. |
|
Part IV Subsection 42(14)5.21 |
Income Tax Examination |
Instructions to the District Case Managers examining cases within an industry including:
|
|
Part IV Subsection 42(14)5.22 |
Income Tax Examination |
Instructions to group managers examining cases within an industry including:
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Retail Guide
|
|
|
Provides assistance to examiners in the proper evaluation of depreciation if the taxpayer has segregated the costs associated with large purchases to accelerate the depreciation deductions. |
